On 2014-07-19 08:00, Paul Johnson wrote :
> I don't see how that's the case, the reason being that the Supreme
> Court has clearly ruled that tribes are above the state but
> semi-dependant on the fed, as far as the law is concerned.
> Furthermore, the state may still intervene, but has the option
> Am 19/lug/2014 um 02:08 schrieb johnw :
>
> So when tagging a business, a mall, or a apartment building, you map the area
> it covers using landuse, add parking lots and other amenities on top, and put
> the buildings in and tag the buildings with their use (offices, house,
> apartment, etc
> Am 19/lug/2014 um 02:08 schrieb johnw :
>
> Landuse=transportation is disused too for stations, etc).
there is already landuse=railway
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tag
Hey
So far landuse is not misused that much than other tags. Yes, we have
discussions how far landuse reaches and we, for sure, miss some like
highway or a defined solution for mixed types.
landuse=religion does not describe any landuse. It is about the owner of
the property or maybe even only th
Hello,
I've just stumbled upon the two keys min_age=* and minage=*.
Both have a WIki-page and seem to mean a similar thing:
* min_age: "It is used when the visitors of an amenity need to have a
minimum age in years. "
* minage: "It tells you how old you have to be to enter a shop, venue,
building
Hi,
I'm for minage. Compare with minspeed and maxspeed, for example.
--
Cheers,
Andrew
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Both variants (compound spelling and underscore) exist.
See min_height or building:min_level for example, which are used in
(esp. 3D-)building-tagging.
The highway-related tags minspeed, maxspeed and maxheight use the
compound spelling indeed, but they are way more readable than minage in
my opinio
My first impression is that minage should be used only for admission into
the place.
It seems using minage "for usage" is not very different from admission in
case of a playground.
In case of a school, it would be better to describe the school teaching
level using isced:level=* or some country-spec
On 5/19/2014 3:34 PM, Tod Fitch wrote:
For what it is worth, I've attempted to tag the intersections
athttp://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/37.42584/-122.19230
andhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/37.42432/-122.19177 per the wiki but
don't know if I've done it correctly.
Thanks to the e
The only reference to a likely center turn lane tagging I can find is
lanes:both_ways= , with a count of only 605 occurrences. Since there
are over 22000 turn:lanes:forward , is the center turn lane generally
untagged, or is there a better tag than lanes:both_ways?
lanes:both_ways=1
turn:lanes:both_ways=left
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Mike N wrote:
>
> The only reference to a likely center turn lane tagging I can find is
> lanes:both_ways= , with a count of only 605 occurrences. Since there are
> over 22000 turn:lanes:forward , is the center turn
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:centre_turn_lane
?
This is what I've been using.
-James
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 18:11:11 -0500
From: ba...@ursamundi.org
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Center Turn Lane Tagging?
lanes:both_ways=1turn:lanes:both_ways=left
On Sat, Jul
Anyone know the tag for townhouses?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
I'd tag it as building=house and subdivide it as necessary similar to a
stripmall if you know where the walls between units/addresses are.
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Hans De Kryger
wrote:
> Anyone know the tag for townhouses?
>
> ___
> Tagging
Just tag it as the both_ways model; unless I'm missing something. NE2 is
good at finding minutae, but often finds poor ways to tag things in a
consistent manner (most glaringly, a mass retag of all US highways as trunk
instead of primary, even when undivided).
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Ja
15 matches
Mail list logo
