On 12.07.2014 09:59, Christoph Hormann wrote:
> Most of these are from the Antarctica import [1] where they mostly
> comply with the definition quite well although in some part areas have
> a thin, patchy scree cover.
>
> The Corine natural=rock areas on the other hand are not
> natural=bare_ro
On 12.07.2014 08:25, malenki wrote:
> When a proposal just sits in a wiki and doesn't get spread actively by
> it's author on OSM channels (forums, mailing lists) it doesn't get much
> attention. Even /when/ it is spread a lot of people (I included)
> often prefer to let it be.
Unfortunately, I am
According to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dofficial
access=designated "often includes ways that have no legal dedication
like e.g. recommended routes of a local bicycle club"
Is it OK to use this tag in situations like this? It would make
access=designated nearly meaningless and
On Sunday 13 July 2014, Friedrich Volkmann wrote:
> >
> > The Corine natural=rock areas on the other hand are not
> > natural=bare_rock, neither factually as you can easily check with a
> > few examples nor by definition [2] where it is simply described as
> > "Scree, cliffs, rocks outcrops, includ
