Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Power transmission refinement - RFC 2

2014-07-05 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
> Am 04/lug/2014 um 17:48 schrieb François Lacombe > : > > * tower:type is already used a lot with man_made=tower > tower=* and pole=* got some values to replace tower:type=termination and > transitions like tower=air_to_ground or tower:type=air_to_ground I think we should not mix up man_mad

Re: [Tagging] Suggestions for the correct tagging of Field borders

2014-07-05 Thread Simon Wüllhorst
Ok, you’re right. I was a bit confused about the inconsistent usage of landuse and natural tag. Sometimes it’s not clear why there is used the natural or landuse key. For forrest you have both (landuse=forrest and natural=wood) but it seems to be the only one where you can decide whether it is mana

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Port and terminals

2014-07-05 Thread sabas88
Dear all, after almost six months from the original proposal, now I would like to ask you to vote these two new tags. Accepting the tag landuse=port would improve the detailed tagging of port areas, for example to tell apart container terminals (easily distinguishable from satellite imagery) from

Re: [Tagging] man_made=pipeline - is onewayness implied?

2014-07-05 Thread Peter Wendorff
Hi, so you would call the Mittellandkanal, connecting Elbe and Weser in Germany a lake? I agree with Bulwersator. A canal does not necessarily have a flow direction. It may be built for water transport (then it might have one), it may be built inclining - indicating a "natural" flow. It may even h

Re: [Tagging] Suggestions for the correct tagging of Field borders

2014-07-05 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
> Am 05/lug/2014 um 11:08 schrieb Simon Wüllhorst : > > Is a proposal-page in the wiki needed? It is Not strictly needed (you can use the tag straight away), but it is recommended in order to have some documentation remaining. I'd also suggest to put a link (see also) on landuse farmland

Re: [Tagging] man_made=pipeline - is onewayness implied?

2014-07-05 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
> Am 05/lug/2014 um 14:50 schrieb Peter Wendorff : > > so you would call the Mittellandkanal, connecting Elbe and Weser in > Germany a lake? no, and I can't imagine how you read this from my posting, the Mittellandkanal had indeed a lot of flow, besides transportation bringing water to indus

Re: [Tagging] man_made=pipeline - is onewayness implied?

2014-07-05 Thread Peter Wendorff
Am 05.07.2014 20:25, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > > >> Am 05/lug/2014 um 14:50 schrieb Peter Wendorff >> : >> >> so you would call the Mittellandkanal, connecting Elbe and Weser >> in Germany a lake? > > > > no, and I can't imagine how you read this from my posting, the > Mittellandkanal ha

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Power transmission refinement - RFC 2

2014-07-05 Thread François Lacombe
014-07-05 10:59 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > I think we should not mix up man_made=tower and power=tower > and suggest to use power_tower:type or sth similar rather than tower:type > for your proposal > Hi Martin, Actually, there's no mix up between man_made and power since only power=tow

Re: [Tagging] man_made=pipeline - is onewayness implied?

2014-07-05 Thread André Pirard
On 2014-07-05 14:50, Peter Wendorff wrote : Hi, so you would call the Mittellandkanal, connecting Elbe and Weser in Germany a lake? I agree with Bulwersator. A canal does not necessarily have a flow direction. It may be built for water transport (then it might have

Re: [Tagging] Where do source tags belong?

2014-07-05 Thread André Pirard
Hi, A short summary of my thoughts and a reply. source:XXX=* describes an object attribute, not a change attribute, and should hence be an object tag. To benefit from overpass queries based on source:XXX=*, it must be an object tag. Forci

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk-be] Where do source tags belong?

2014-07-05 Thread Jo
off list: André, I'm in the process of ending the addition of 37000 stops of De Lijn to OSM. None of them have the holy source tags and still I'm able to compute which ones still need to be done. So I'm not worried about getting bitten in the back. I have a system in place which works and which