[Tagging] Feature proposal - Remotely controlled devices - RFC

Hi, Just beside street cabinets proposal, I found interesting to introduce remotely controlled devices. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Remotely_controlled_devices As explained in this small proposal, our goal is to describe in which ways operators may interact with their de

Re: [Tagging] Aerodrome types

I agree with using the key "aerodrome" to specify further the type of the aerodrome (instead of aerodrome:type=* or type=*). Related to this: An airport is a special kind of aerodrome, and I think it is poorly documented on the wiki how to tag it. Looking at taginfo, it becomes clear that internat

Re: [Tagging] Aerodrome types

2014-07-02 18:32 GMT+02:00 John Packer : > An airport is a special kind of aerodrome, and I think it is poorly > documented on the wiki how to tag it. > >From previous discussions I think I remember that it isn't clear what an "airport" is. Most if not all our "aerodromes" are probably airports,

Re: [Tagging] Aerodrome types

Interesting questions! The way I see it, we don't need to get into the details of who owns it (whether it is a company or the government), but classify according to it's use. When I say airport, I mean the kind of aerodrome the average person can use, usually with some stores and airflight compan

Re: [Tagging] Rendering change: buildings within highway areas

Am 01.07.2014 12:34, schrieb Matthijs Melissen: On 1 July 2014 11:25, Janko Mihelic' > wrote: If I'm right, this will mostly affect pedestrian areas (highway=pedestrian + area=yes) that have buildings mapped over them. Yes, that's correct. Did you consider bu

Re: [Tagging] Aerodrome types

I don't like this way of mapping. There might be some overlaps, what if one aerodrome has a military and a public part? I would rather use separate tags like: aeroway=aerodrome access=private/public landuse=military international_flights=yes/no ... ___ T