2014-05-14 7:17 GMT+02:00 Andrew Errington :
> You could also refer to the Wiki:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tunnel
>
> "For covered passages which are open on one side, often found on mountain
> roads or ways underneath a building, use covered=* in place of tunnel=*."
>
> Or tunnel=a
On Wed, 14 May 2014 18:33:43 Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2014-05-14 7:17 GMT+02:00 Andrew Errington :
> > You could also refer to the Wiki:
> > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tunnel
> >
> > "For covered passages which are open on one side, often found on mountain
> > roads or ways underne
On 14.05.14 11:33, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> http://static.panoramio.com/photos/large/65229337.jpg
PMJI, but this looks much like the end of runway 16/34 of Vienna International
Airport, so neither sun nor avalanche protection... ;)
/al
___
Tagging
2014-05-14 4:51 GMT+02:00 Fernando Trebien :
> For a long time I believed that the
> only practical reason for placing "capital=yes" or "state_capital=yes"
> on a node was to help the renderer decide how to render the label; the
> renderer could then avoid the trouble of handling relations, even
>
Interesting. So how is capital=* being used in Europe?
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 2:27 AM, Andreas Goss wrote:
> Am 5/13/14 17:40 , schrieb Fernando Trebien:
>
>> So if you know how it's being done
>> in yours, or if you can try figuring it out, please take a minute to
>> describe it here briefly.
>
Am 5/14/14 17:06 , schrieb Fernando Trebien:
Interesting. So how is capital=* being used in Europe?
Just running the overpass API with capital* over some countries:
Spain: Using capital=8 extensivly (!!!) together with admin_level=8 not
really using 4 or 6 though.
France, Italy have some ca
"... Czech Republic taginfo=capital" what do you mean?
So it seems that, except for Russia, the most common practice is as
described in
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/capital#Notes_on_actual_usage
. We should probaby vote on this proposal now and make this the
default practi
"... Czech Republic taginfo=capital" what do you mean?
Ooops. Must have deleted a line there. Bascally they are not using
capital= at all apart for some exceptions as you can also see on taginfo.
We should probaby vote on this proposal now and make this the
default practice. This makes admin
Following from Aleksandr Dezhin's "Why not use admin_level=* without
capital=yes?" in that wiki talk page, why not? Any place=city/town
with admin_level=2 is a country capital. Any place=city/town/village
with admin_level=4 is a state capital (at least in Brazil). This would
remove the need for a c
Am 5/14/14 23:29 , schrieb Fernando Trebien:
Any place=city/town/village
with admin_level=4 is a state capital (at least in Brazil).
What about your capital? According to Wikkipedia that's a capital of the
Federal District, too.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bras%C3%ADlia
__
openstre
BrasÃlia is the only exception which is a capital of two different
administrative levels. And both the relations for the federal district
[1] and the country [2] correctly express that idea. I know it's not a
rule that applies to every country, and precisely because of that it
would make even more
Am 5/15/14 01:10 , schrieb Fernando Trebien:
BrasÃlia is the only exception which is a capital of two different
administrative levels. And both the relations for the federal district
[1] and the country [2] correctly express that idea.
As long as you only look at admin_level=2 and =4 But even s
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 8:52 PM, Andreas Goss wrote:
> Exacly, so why tag the level number on the node when we have relations and
> can incude the capitals as role:admin_centre? And then there are no
> exceptions. Which is how it is usually done here in Germany.
I've checked the first 15 cities i
13 matches
Mail list logo
