Just a quick comment:
If it's not useful to use it on ways, then I don't think we should
recommend it on nodes *or ways* on the wiki page (as it is currently).
In fact, we should recommend against putting on ways.
2014-04-09 16:16 GMT-03:00 André Pirard :
> On 2014-04-09 10:47, Pieren wrote :
Yes, I agree.
That recommendation was introduced yesterday by Pieren [1]. I strongly
oppose that.
The wiki is not for documenting Tagging-trends, but for documenting best
practices. And I would say, that tagging noexit=yes on ways is not a
best practice.
In my opinion an acceptable comment in t
On 10.04.2014 14:51, John Packer wrote:
> Just a quick comment:
> If it's not useful to use it on ways, then I don't think we should
> recommend it on nodes /or ways/ on the wiki page (as it is currently).
> In fact, we should recommend against putting on ways.
Well, there is one person against wi
I removed the use on ways from the wiki page.
The wiki is not for documenting Tagging-trends, but for documenting best
> practices.
>
I agree 100% with this.
I also added the following phrase to the "Usage" section:
> In the past this tag was used on ways very often, but because tagging on
> way
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:48 PM, John Packer wrote:
> I also added the following phrase to the "Usage" section:
>>
>> In the past this tag was used on ways very often, but because tagging on
>> ways has several disadvantages, you should rather tag noexit=yes on nodes.
I cannot agree. What is the
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:10 PM, fly wrote:
> Well, there is one person against wiki fiddling and in favour of using
> it on ways, who simply does change the just corrected version without
> further discussion.
Well, consider that I'm speaking in the name of the contributors who
added 118000 'no
Am 10.04.2014 15:48, schrieb John Packer:
I removed the use on ways from the wiki page.
The wiki is not for documenting Tagging-trends, but for
documenting best practices.
I agree 100% with this.
I also added the following phrase to the "Usage" section:
In the past this tag was u
Am 10.04.2014 15:54, schrieb Pieren:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:10 PM, fly wrote:
Well, there is one person against wiki fiddling and in favour of using
it on ways, who simply does change the just corrected version without
further discussion.
Well, consider that I'm speaking in the name of th
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Florian Schäfer wrote:
> True, in the most cases it is not important. But sometimes it is, for
> example in my T-deadend example, mentioned on this ML.
> All cases can be covered by the tagging on nodes. The tagging on ways can't
> cover all cases (deadends with m
On 2014-04-10 15:07, Florian Schäfer
wrote :
Yes, I agree.
That recommendation was introduced yesterday by Pieren [1]. I
strongly oppose that.
The wiki is not for documenting Tagging-trends, but for
documenting best practices. And I wo
I guess the problem arises from tagging dead-ends in a geo database.
QA tools should keep there false positives for themself, not in OSM, don't you
think?
On 10 avril 2014 16:59:44 UTC+02:00, Pieren wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Florian Schäfer
> wrote:
>
>> True, in the most cases i
On 4/10/2014 12:10 PM, Yves wrote:
I guess the problem arises from tagging dead-ends in a geo database.
QA tools should keep there false positives for themself, not in OSM,
don't you think?
Except that I don't use QA tools when editing data. But often as I
create something that ends suspic
On 4/10/2014 10:59 AM, Pieren wrote:
But we don't have "problems" with the tag on the way ! It's true that
the wiki has to document the best practices but it should not fordid
practices that are not wrong, harmfull, unclear or ambiguous ! I
regret the time when people worked with a more open mind
Dear all,
The voting ended, thanks for all of you for joining the discussion and voting.
The proposal received 8 approvals and 1 maybe. Considering the limited scope of
the proposal, I therefore consider it accepted and will update the wiki
accordingly.
Nevertheless, in the discussion the adva
I agree with André Pirard that:
1. If we say it should be tagged on the way, it should be clearer how it
should be tagged (what if the cul-de-sac is splitted, etc)
2. "noexit" was a bad choice of name for this key
Personally I don't know if using noexit=yes on ways is used by any software
nowadays
On 2014-04-10 16:59, Pieren wrote :
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Florian Schäfer
> wrote:
>
>> True, in the most cases it is not important. But sometimes it is, for
>> example in my T-deadend example, mentioned on this ML.
>> All cases can be covered by the tagging on nodes. The tagging on
Am 10.04.2014 16:59, schrieb Pieren:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Florian Schäfer wrote:
True, in the most cases it is not important. But sometimes it is, for
example in my T-deadend example, mentioned on this ML.
All cases can be covered by the tagging on nodes. The tagging on ways can't
Am 10.04.2014 16:01, schrieb Pieren:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:48 PM, John Packer wrote:
>
>> I also added the following phrase to the "Usage" section:
>>>
>>> In the past this tag was used on ways very often, but because tagging on
>>> ways has several disadvantages, you should rather tag noex
18 matches
Mail list logo
