Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - No votes for proposals opening_hours_holiday_select and opening_hours_open_until

2014-04-07 22:11 GMT+02:00 Robin `ypid` Schneider : > I created two proposals for which the time to vote is over but there are no > votes :(. Should we open the voting once again or what is the usual > procedure in > such a case? The proposals are: > of course you can reput this to voting, but

Re: [Tagging] noexit=yes on ways ?

On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 3:48 AM, fly wrote: > noexit=yes has nothing in common with the traffic_sign as: > > 1. it only is about motorized traffic where noexit=yes is about every > travel mode. > 2. it is used at the beginning of a cul-de-sac and an information for > driver of motorized vehicles w

Re: [Tagging] noexit=yes on ways ?

On 08.04.2014 12:10, Pieren wrote: > On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 3:48 AM, fly wrote: >> noexit=yes has nothing in common with the traffic_sign as: >> >> 1. it only is about motorized traffic where noexit=yes is about every >> travel mode. >> 2. it is used at the beginning of a cul-de-sac and an inform

Re: [Tagging] noexit=yes on ways ?

I tagged noexit=yes on the ways. Why ? If I remember correctly some more experienced mapper told me it was ok to do so. And perhaps I read the wiki page before June 28, 2011, when there was nothing mentioned about way or node. You cannot assume each mapper reads all wiki pages every week or foll

Re: [Tagging] noexit=yes on ways ?

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:57 PM, fly wrote: > The major points in my view are: > * We do not need to tag cul-de-sac as defined by the traffic_sign. This > information is available through geometry and/or access tags. This is not related with tagging on the last node or the way. The tag is only r

Re: [Tagging] noexit=yes on ways ?

On 2014-04-04 17:35, Pieren wrote : > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Nelson A. de Oliveira > wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM, fly wrote: >>> If it is accepted, I gonna hange the wiki accordingly and gonna ask a >>> for validator checks in JOSM, as we have more than 100,000 ways with >

Re: [Tagging] noexit=yes on ways ?

On Apr 8, 2014, at 3:10 AM, Pieren wrote: > On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 3:48 AM, fly wrote: > > Please, return to earth. Tagging traffic signs is just a funny > activity in fully mapped areas. How do you specify a speed limit in > OSM ? with a "traffic_sign" tag on a node or primarily with the > "max

Re: [Tagging] noexit=yes on ways ?

Hi, A problem raised in 2013-12 on talk-be regarding the error with sign F45 that nobody corrected. I finally did it. I had brought the subject to Tagging and it reached a consensus with Georg's message which I quote below. But nobody

Re: [Tagging] noexit=yes on ways ?

now make sure that all QA-tools and editors/validators follow those rules. I fear that otherwise we will keep seeing noexit tags that are used incorrectly. On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:38 PM, André Pirard wrote: > Hi, > > A problem raised in 2013-12 on talk-be regarding the error with sign > F45