Following this discussion:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2014-January/016284.html
Please find:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Ski_Jumping
Yves
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lis
On Sunday 30 March 2014, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
> The Rio de la Plata example on the wiki page is pretty weird.
>
Well -the Rio de la Plata example is definitely the largest, but not the
weirdest since the coastline there is placed at the outer limit of the
estuary. In case of the Northern
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:route%3Dpiste
is open for voting.
Yves
On 03/19/2014 10:40 PM, yvecai wrote:
This proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:route%3Dpiste
... is a bit behind route=ski in taginfo.
The goal is to extend route re
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Tag:site%3Dpiste
is now open for voting
Yves
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Hi,
On 29.03.2014 13:41, nounours77 wrote:
> BUT: I asked OsmAnd to render the tag, and the
> answer was - quite understandable: "/Only officially supported tags will
> be rendered/".
This is silly. How do they define "officially supported tag"? There's no
such thing in OpenStreetMap.
I suspect
On 30.03.2014 12:56, yvecai wrote:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Tag:site%3Dpiste
> is now open for voting
Do not like piste as value, as it is easily misunderstood and you do
include other features. Better use winter_resort or similar.
fly
___
On 03/30/2014 05:03 PM, fly wrote:
Do not like piste as value, as it is easily misunderstood and you do
include other features. Better use winter_resort or similar. fly
Hi Fly,
I can follow you on this, but personally I choose piste for the
following reasons:
1) semanticaly in line with
On 2014-03-29 14:13, SomeoneElse wrote
:
On 29/03/2014 12:41, nounours77 wrote:
As discussed in my earlier post, I think
voting is important even for specific service tags to make them
offical.
Not really - OSM does
Well put André. +100.
On 2014-03-30 22:25, André Pirard wrote:
> On 2014-03-29 14:13, SomeoneElse wrote : On 29/03/2014 12:41, nounours77
> wrote:
> As discussed in my earlier post, I think voting is important even for
> specific service tags to make them offical.
> Not really - OSM does
@ Andre, Nounours,
welcome to a project without goals. If you want to change the things you're
writing about, then you're most welcome to join the Future Group
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Future
Cheers, Johan
2014-03-30 22:25 GMT+02:00 André Pirard :
> On 2014-03-29 14:13, SomeoneElse
Hi,
On 30.03.2014 22:25, André Pirard wrote:
> Unfortunately, this is the kind of fuzziness that makes GPSes send cars
> to forbidden places or through mud
You are obviously trying to hijack this thread because some time ago you
changed something on the wiki and someone else complained. You thoug
Hey Guys
Sorry, but I cannot follow your arguements as they are way to abstract.
Would you please either speak in clear word (links) or discuss your
private issue somewhere else.
Thanks
On 31.03.2014 00:25, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> On 30.03.2014 22:25, André Pirard wrote:
>> Unfortunately, this i
On 29.03.2014 13:41, nounours77 wrote:
Hey nounours77 + list
> As discussed in my earlier post, I think voting is important even for
> specific service tags to make them offical.
> Therefore, I extend the voting period for the boat_sharing proposal:
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Propos
In reading over a proposal in here for apartment sharing that included a
list of other tourism keys relating to lodging or accommodation that
included, among other remotely located shelters, the value wilderness_hut.
We have 60 such wilderness cabins and 4 ice huts in Alaska managed by the
Alaska D
14 matches
Mail list logo
