Re: [Tagging] feature Proposal - RFC 2 - tourism = apartment

2014-02-16 Thread Philip Barnes
On Sun, 2014-02-16 at 07:06 +0700, Dave Swarthout wrote: > >I would prefer the plural tourism=apartments. > > > I prefer singular because the plural term explicitly states that more > than one unit is available to rent while the singular implies only > that there is at least one unit for rent on

Re: [Tagging] feature Proposal - RFC 2 - tourism = apartment

2014-02-16 Thread Dan S
2014-02-16 8:29 GMT+00:00 Philip Barnes : > On Sun, 2014-02-16 at 07:06 +0700, Dave Swarthout wrote: >> >I would prefer the plural tourism=apartments. >> >> >> I prefer singular because the plural term explicitly states that more >> than one unit is available to rent while the singular implies only

Re: [Tagging] feature Proposal - RFC 2 - tourism = apartment

2014-02-16 Thread Alex Rollin
bathtub furnished -- Alex On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Dan S wrote: > 2014-02-16 8:29 GMT+00:00 Philip Barnes : > > On Sun, 2014-02-16 at 07:06 +0700, Dave Swarthout wrote: > >> >I would prefer the plural tourism=apartments. > >> > >> > >> I prefer singular because the plural term explicit

[Tagging] Architectural Monuments - ideas?

2014-02-16 Thread nounours77
Hello, I'm currently importing a list of Architectural Monuments into OSM. The available information is the name, the architect, sometimes the construction period. But how should I tag it? I was thinking about three possibilities: 1) historic=architectural_monument: Some buildings are old, but

Re: [Tagging] Architectural Monuments - ideas?

2014-02-16 Thread Clifford Snow
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 12:31 PM, nounours77 wrote: > I'm currently importing a list of Architectural Monuments into OSM. The > available information is the name, the architect, sometimes the > construction period. But how should I tag it? I was thinking about three > possibilities: > > 1) histori