Re: [Tagging] Multiple amenities inside shared area

I would make two multipolygon relations, not site, and put no tags on the area. 2014-01-28 Ronnie Soak > Hi, > > I'd like to get some opinions on a mapping/tagging problem I have here. > > Usually I would tag an amenity (inside a building) that is enclosed by an > area that is clearly part > of

Re: [Tagging] Multiple amenities inside shared area

2014/1/28 Janko Mihelić > I would make two multipolygon relations, not site, and put no tags on the > area. > > Could you explain why? A multipoligon relation with just one outer member is not common practice (at least not here in my region.) Regards, Chaos _

Re: [Tagging] Multiple amenities inside shared area

2014/1/28 Janko Mihelić > I would make two multipolygon relations, not site, and put no tags on the > area. > > Could you explain why? A multipoligon relation with just one outer member is not common practice (at least not here in my region.) Regards, Chaos _

Re: [Tagging] Multiple amenities inside shared area

It's not a common solution because it's not a common problem. I think it's better than site because it only uses the geometry of the area, and site takes into account the tags on the area. So if you put a landuse=* and barrier=fence, site says "this school consists of a fence and a landuse", and mu

Re: [Tagging] Wikipedia tag validator

On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:25:48AM -0800, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > Keepright has a new maintainer, and will be revived on a new server soon. is there an issue tracker or other possibility to report bugs and issues for keepright? Richard ___ Tagging maili

Re: [Tagging] Multiple amenities inside shared area

Hi Ronnia, as the use case was an outer area shared by two amenities in different building, it's a multipolygon with one outer and one inner member, and that should be fairly common around the world, as it's the most simple case for an osm multipolygon, right? regards Peter Am 28.01.2014 12:20,

Re: [Tagging] Multiple amenities inside shared area

2014/1/28 Peter Wendorff > Hi Ronnia, > as the use case was an outer area shared by two amenities in different > building, it's a multipolygon with one outer and one inner member, and > that should be fairly common around the world, as it's the most simple > case for an osm multipolygon, right?

Re: [Tagging] Multiple amenities inside shared area

Hi Ronnie, recall the task: there is an area with a fence. inside that fence there are two buildings. one building (b1) and the outer space (s) are used by a kindergarten, the second building (b2) and the outer space (s) are used by a primary school. Our proposal for the tagging was: 1) use a mul

Re: [Tagging] Multiple amenities inside shared area

2014/1/28 Peter Wendorff > > one building (b1) and the outer space (s) are used by a kindergarten, > the second building (b2) and the outer space (s) are used by a primary > school. > > Our proposal for the tagging was: > 1) use a multipolygon with outer s and inner (b1) and tag it as primary > s

Re: [Tagging] Multiple amenities inside shared area

It seems to be the most correct solution and the "cost" of relations is not that relevant as it's an easy multipolygon and this kind of multipolygons are quite good supported by most editors (iD, josm) and software. Perhaps we get a proper area type in future, which should IMHO at least cover this

Re: [Tagging] Multiple amenities inside shared area

2014-01-28 Ronnie Soak > > Of course this comes with all the downsides of relations (maintainability > by newbies, pickup by renderers, routing, search..) > but still seems to be the most correct solution. > I think renderers, routers and other data consumers have shown themselves to use the mul

Re: [Tagging] Wikipedia tag validator

Hi, I'm wondering, if you're aware of WIWOSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WIWOSM They provide lists of bad wikipedia tags, too: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WIWOSM#Logging regards Werner ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.

Re: [Tagging] Wikipedia tag validator

And thanks for providing link! (sorry for separate messages) On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:05:58 -0800 Werner Hoch wrote Hi, I'm wondering, if you're aware of WIWOSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WIWOSM They provide lists of bad wikipedia tags, too: https://

Re: [Tagging] Wikipedia tag validator

I was no aware despite my attempts to find something like this. But I prefer report produced by my validator as it is providing info what is a problem. On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:05:58 -0800 Werner Hoch wrote Hi, I'm wondering, if you're aware of WIWOSM: https://w

Re: [Tagging] Multiple amenities inside shared area

on 28.01.2014 12:28, Janko Mihelić wrote: because it's not a common problem. ??? there are e.g. a lot of shopping centers out there... Best regards, Michael. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinf

Re: [Tagging] Proposal - Voting finished - Gambling

On 20 January 2014 01:31, Matthijs Melissen wrote: > I have therefore re-opened the voting for an additional week. After extending the voting period for a week, the proposal is now really accepted. There are now 15 approving votes and 1 opposing vote. Thank you again for voting. I also saw that

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Bag shop, pet shop

Dear all, Sorry for taking so long to getting back to this proposal. Thank you for all your comments. I confirm that this discussion does not concern a mechanical/automatic edit. This discussion is only about what the community thinks is the preferred tag, and permission for automatic re-tagging

[Tagging] Pre-proposal - Photography

Dear all, We currently have the following tags for photography: - shop=photo (1870x) - craft=photographer (806x) - shop=photo_studio (329x) - shop=photography (117x) - shop=photographer (58x) To what kind of entities do these tags correspond? There seem to be some redundant tags. As far as I kno