I am not qualified to answer any of these questions as I've never got
involved in editing boundaries in OSM however it does raise an
interesting wider question, which is, how do we map all territories that
are claimed by one country or another but not internationally recognised?
Some territori
Hi all
With this mail I open the voting phase. The proposal page is located here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/opening_hours_open_end_fixed_time_extension
I would like to hear your opinions about this extension.
--
Live long and prosper
Robin Schneider
___
Maybe you would like to give just one or two weeks more time for voting
because of the christmas holidays.
best regards,
Martin
2013/12/23 Robin `ypid` Schneider
> Hi all
>
> With this mail I open the voting phase. The proposal page is located here:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Propose
I gave it some more thought and I think it may be best for the
community to abstain from such disputes (otherwise we would be dragged
into them). The fact that we refer to them in a special way
linguistically (calling them "disputed territories" or "territorial
claims") means to me that they probab
Sure. I have no problem with that :) The voting end is now set to 2014-01-20.
On 12/23/2013 04:32 PM, Martin Vonwald wrote:
Maybe you would like to give just one or two weeks more time for voting
because of the christmas holidays.
2013/12/23 Robin `ypid` Schneider
Hi all
With this mail I op
Or, disputed territories wouldn't even have an admin_level tag and
would be mapped as regions (which always seemed to me as a generic
"fallback" for things that do not fit a specific standard):
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dregion
The boundary lines would still need boundary=* for
Am 23.12.2013 11:56, schrieb Jonathan:
I am not qualified to answer any of these questions as I've never got
involved in editing boundaries in OSM however it does raise an
interesting wider question, which is, how do we map all territories
that are claimed by one country or another but not inter
If I were doing the map of that region and had to explain to Sudanese
and South-Sudanese my decision, I'd either add both borders (your
suggestion), or create a special entity (my suggestion). But for those
who are not involved in the conflict, is the area part of Sudan or
South-Sudan? I guess they
There's some related discussion on the Talk:Tag:boundary=adminstrative wiki
page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:boundary=administrative#Disputed_borders
A suggestion is to replace the 'inner' and 'outer' relation roles (which is
trivial to determine) with roles that specify the claim
First of all I think there is no really perfect solution to the problem. To
me this is inherent to the dispute as different parties have a different
view of what's right and wrong. So I think this conflict will show up in
the data anyway.
2013/12/23 Fernando Trebien
> Today, from a practical pe
I'm also hesitant to bring apps to the discussion, since we don't tag
for apps, but things like Nominatim (a fundamental piece of the
ecosystem) have been around for a long time and I doubt something much
different will emerge. One could bring satellite navigation apps into
the discussion and the l
11 matches
Mail list logo
