[Tagging] how to tag a terrace?

I wonder how we should tag a terrace? For a terraced house there is the current practise of tagging it in the abbreviated form of building=terrace, but doesn't that create a problem for tagging terraces? I am for instance refering to something like this: http://wallpaperscraft.com/download/italy_r

Re: [Tagging] how to tag a terrace?

I think there should be a big "building=yes" polygon over the terrace and the mansion attached to it (or building=mansion or whatever). Then put a polygon over just the terrace, and tag it building:part=terrace. There are 21 of them in the database right now: http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/

Re: [Tagging] how to tag a terrace?

I am one of the mappers of the "Terrazza Mascagni" [1], took as example. First of all we have to clarify the term "Terrace" (""Terrazza" in Italian). Indeed the construction is the "terrace of the city" facing the sea. It looks similar to an house terrace (it has few balustrades, parapets, see the

Re: [Tagging] how to tag a terrace?

> Am 13/dic/2013 um 12:10 schrieb Janko Mihelić : > > I think there should be a big "building=yes" polygon over the terrace and the > mansion attached to it (or building=mansion or whatever). Then put a polygon > over just the terrace, and tag it building:part=terrace. There are 21 of them >

Re: [Tagging] how to tag a terrace?

On 12/13/13 9:30 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > >> Am 13/dic/2013 um 12:10 schrieb Janko Mihelić : >> >> I think there should be a big "building=yes" polygon over the terrace and >> the mansion attached to it (or building=mansion or whatever). Then put a >> polygon over just the terrace, and ta

[Tagging] End voting bicycle=use_cycleway

Today the voting of the bicycle=use_cyclewayended. Voting results: Yes: 10 (not counting the 2 that made the proposal) No: 11 Abstain: 3 This is reason enough for us to work on a better proposal so we reject the

Re: [Tagging] how to tag a terrace?

Am 13/dic/2013 um 13:37 schrieb Fabrizio Carrai : The final results is [1] a multypoligon the includes few components, including: - A highway=pedestrian area, with black and white tiles marked as surface=paving_stones (that's the one with the terrace's balustrades) - An acquarium [4]

Re: [Tagging] how to tag a terrace?

2013/12/13 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > > Am 13/dic/2013 um 13:37 schrieb Fabrizio Carrai : > > The final results is [1] a multypoligon the includes few components, > including: > > A highway=pedestrian area, with black and white tiles marked as > surface=paving_stones (that's the one with the terrace

Re: [Tagging] how to tag a terrace?

2013/12/13 Dan S > "highway=pedestrian area, with [...] surface=paving_stones" seems to > tag it pretty well to me. > those tags aren't on the relation that represents the whole object though. > > > IMHO building would fit, what are the alternatives? man_made and > historic, > > but historic

Re: [Tagging] End voting bicycle=use_cycleway

On Fri, 13 Dec 2013, Pee Wee wrote: > > Today the voting of the bicycle=use_cycleway ended.  Voting results: > >   > > Yes:  10 (not counting the 2 that made the proposal)  > > No:  11  > > Abstain:  3 > >   > > This is reason enough for us to work on a better proposal so we reject the > current o

Re: [Tagging] how to tag a terrace?

Richard Welty wrote: > On 12/13/13 9:30 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > >> Am 13/dic/2013 um 12:10 schrieb Janko Mihelić : > >> > >> I think there should be a big "building=yes" polygon over the > terrace and the mansion attached to it (or building=mansion or > whatever). Then put a polygon o

Re: [Tagging] how to tag a terrace?

2013/12/13 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > 2013/12/13 Dan S >> >> "highway=pedestrian area, with [...] surface=paving_stones" seems to >> tag it pretty well to me. > > > > those tags aren't on the relation that represents the whole object though. > > >> >> >> > IMHO building would fit, what are the alte

Re: [Tagging] how to tag a terrace?

2013/12/13 John F. Eldredge > Gardens and parks that are on sloping land will often consist of a series > of terraces (flat areas alternating with slopes or retaining walls), > without structures being built on them. > yes, they are themselves structures. cheers, Martin ___

Re: [Tagging] End voting bicycle=use_cycleway

2013/12/13 Pee Wee > Today the voting of the > bicycle=use_cyclewayended. > Voting results: > > > > Yes: 10 (not counting the 2 that made the proposal) > > No: 11 > > Abstain: 3 > > > > This is reason enough for us to

Re: [Tagging] End voting bicycle=use_cycleway

@ Martin I understand what you are saying. With regard to routing I did not expect we had to explain why it could be improved by this new tag. There have been some examples like this onesho