2013/11/26 Janko Mihelić
> the problem is that lots of online businesses want to get on the map, and
> I don't know what tags to suggest. Should we invent something like
> office=online? Then it could be further specified with online:shop=clothes,
> online=pizza_delivery, or something like that.
2013/11/26 Manuel Hohmann
> > yes, rejected ;-)
>
> I'm really not sure what you don't understand about the word DRAW or
> about the fact that the total number of positive votes exceeds the
> total number of negative votes.
I think it is pointless to continue discussing about a "draw" as the r
When looking for the history of the proposal process page I found it hard
to find the evolution of this page before August 2013. Any hints where to
look for it?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Hi Martin,
It seems that user Fgnievinski split off the page from 'Proposed features':
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features&diff=prev&oldid=930880
Note that earlier this month, I have merged the pages 'Creating a
proposal' and 'Creating a proposal' into 'Proposal pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> I think it is pointless to continue discussing about a "draw" as
> the rules seem quite clearly to require a majority: "A rule of
> thumb for "enough support" is *8 unanimous approval votes* or *15
> total votes with a majority approval*, but other f
Sorry, that should have been:
Note that earlier this month, I have merged the pages 'Creating a
proposal' and 'Proposed features' into 'Proposal process', so you
might also be interested in the history of these pages.
-- Matthijs
On 27 November 2013 10:22, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
> Hi Martin,
2013/11/27 Manuel Hohmann
> > I would go for the "established" "lamp_type" as this is in use and
> > has according values.
>
> AFAIK lamp_type is rather used as a sub-tag to highway=street_lamp and
> specifies the type of lantern (gaslight, electric...). Using this "on
> its own" in the form lamp
2013/11/27 Matthijs Melissen
> Note that earlier this month, I have merged the pages 'Creating a
> proposal' and 'Proposed features' into 'Proposal process',
Thank you for pointing this out, I have added a link to the old history on
the new page 'Proposal process'.
cheers,
Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> This was a misunderstanding, my suggestion was to use lamp_type
> for lamp types (in reply to your suggested light:source I was
> pointing out that there is a used tag) and light_type for the kind
> of device (lantern in this example). IMHO it would
2013/11/26 Frederik Ramm
>
> The probably don't care where the pin is as long as it somehow
> increases their search engine ranking ;)
>
I found a few of those. A travel agency adds a node to the destination, not
where their office is.
2013/11/27 SomeoneElse
> Ignoring the online businesses,
offfice=... is a good key for a ground-truth feature, even if it operates in
the cloud.
"Janko Mihelić" a écrit :
>2013/11/26 Frederik Ramm
>
>>
>> The probably don't care where the pin is as long as it somehow
>> increases their search engine ranking ;)
>>
>
>I found a few of those. A travel
Actually the problem is that most of these businesses adding themselves are
doing more harm than good.
1. Many users copy data from Google - There was even a video on coinmap
encouraging users to do so
2. There are many users who find the location via nominatim, which doesn't
add accuracy to our
Manuel Hohmann wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> > A draw means "rejected" as it isn't a majority for "yes". A
> > "partial yes" like an "abstain" counts as vote that isn't "yes", so
> > for practical reasons you can count this like a "no". At least this
> > is what the
Richard Welty wrote:
> On 11/26/13 4:13 PM, Yves wrote:
> > Placing online businesses on a world map may be more tricky than you
> > think ...
> yes. the concept of a geographic location is sometimes
> challenging. when the business is running a web store
> in the cloud and outsourcing the order f
On 11/27/2013 02:59 PM, Janko Mihelić wrote:
> I was hoping for a general tag that would indicate that something is
> more online than offline. But I guess that kind of generalization is
> not really needed and is hardly accurate.
>
> office=e-commerce sounds good. I'll start putting those on the n
2013/11/27 Jean-Marc Liotier
> Commerce, e-commerce... What is the difference nowadays ?Are there any
> activities left that do not have an online side ?
>
I have a feeling you've got something there. office=commerce seems enough.
Janko
___
Tagging ma
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Janko Mihelić wrote:
>
> 2013/11/27 Jean-Marc Liotier
>
>> Commerce, e-commerce... What is the difference nowadays ?Are there any
>> activities left that do not have an online side ?
>>
>
> I have a feeling you've got something there. office=commerce seems enough
On 11/27/2013 09:33 PM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
> I think we need solutions to high density office mapping, though - and
> OSM as it is today is not a great fit.
Does OSM want to be a directory ?
A shop is a discrete entity - quite the consensual POI. A single tenant
building ? Same. But what abo
18 matches
Mail list logo
