but why is not possible to change all the sub_station in substation if the
old value is deprecated?
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Substation-proposal-approved-and-a-suggestion-for-a-post-vote-change-tp5781224p5786932.html
Sent from the Tagging mailing list arch
It's a good thing to have a look to each sub_station feature.
It allows use to add substation=*, location=*, voltage=* and a few more at
the same time. Which improve a lot our dataset.
If we automatically replace all sub_station power values, we won't be able
to distinguish "old" from "new" featu
I started the Voting for fishing=*
see:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/fishing
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Hi,
On 23.11.2013 11:33, bredy wrote:
> but why is not possible to change all the sub_station in substation if the
> old value is deprecated?
Tagging proposals do not have the power to "deprecate" existing tags,
and I have changed the wiki pages accordingly. Using the wording "this
tag has now be
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Tagging proposals do not have the power to "deprecate" existing tags,
> and I have changed the wiki pages accordingly. Using the wording "this
> tag has now been deprecated" always leads to someone trying to make a
> mass change but we don'
