On 10/11/2013 02:01, François Lacombe wrote:
2013/11/9 Ole Nielsen mailto:on-...@xs4all.nl>>
+1
We should surely not make an automatic conversion of the tag.
Keeping the old tag is useful for tracking substations that need
reviewing.
+1
I asked this question in another thre
Dear all,
So far, only 7 people have voted on this proposal, which involves
automatically changing all objects tagged with
shop=musical_instruments into shop=musical_instrument.
Please note that voting on the feature and voting on the mechanical
edit are distinct, so if you have voted on the firs
Dear Matthijs,
I just changed your page to vote - is that all I have to do? (first time I
vote).
I think the comment on the mechanical edit should go to notes, not description,
not? (--- o.k. I see, it's in the policy, but does it make sense??)
nounours77
Am 10.11.2013 um 19:32 schrieb Matthi
Hi Nonours,
Yes, that's all, thanks for voting.
I was talking about the description field of the changeset, not of the
individual nodes. The field 'description' is the standard field you
fill in when describing a changeset. I think there is no need to place
a comment at all individual notes of th
On 5 November 2013 00:18, Martin Koppenhöfer wrote:
> Am 03.11.2013 um 13:10 schrieb Matthijs Melissen :
>> - amenity=casino: A gambling place with at least one table game.
> I'm not sure if requiring a table game is a good idea, IIRR in Monte Carlo
> you can find casinos with
> only slot machi
On 3 November 2013 15:58, fly wrote:
> I wonder if we should not use leisure in general and try to avoid
> amenity. At least for new tags and tags with low numbers leisure=*
> should be used.
I agree, I will move amusement_arcade to the leisure key.
However, I will leave casino in the amenity ke
