Re: [Tagging] tourism=guest_house or tourism=bed_and_breakfast ?

2013-10-18 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2013/10/17 Dudley Ibbett > From a tourists perspective it is quite important to know whether it is > self catering accommodation or not. It is also important to know whether > it is a single building unit (i.e. house,cottage,chalet) as opposed to a > number of units in a building (i.e. apartment

Re: [Tagging] tourism=guest_house or tourism=bed_and_breakfast ?

2013-10-18 Thread Andrew Errington
On Fri, 18 Oct 2013 01:47:51 Dudley Ibbett wrote: > From a tourists perspective it is quite important to know whether it is > self catering accommodation or not. It is also important to know whether > it is a single building unit (i.e. house,cottage,chalet) as opposed to a > number of units in a b

Re: [Tagging] tourism=guest_house or tourism=bed_and_breakfast ?

2013-10-18 Thread Jonathan
Andrew, I like your idea about the XML file, it is definitely how it will have to go, the idea is at the heart of the "Semantic Web" which is slowly evolving. Of course it shouldn't be just for accommodation, in fact virtually every object that we tag currently should be pulling it's metadat

Re: [Tagging] tourism=guest_house or tourism=bed_and_breakfast ?

2013-10-18 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2013/10/18 Andrew Errington > Surely it's simply a matter of tagging "There is accommodation of some kind > here" and including a URL to the website? There is very little point in > slicing the data so thinly, especially since renderers will paint a little > picture that probably looks identical

Re: [Tagging] [Imports] [NUUG kart] kartverket imports to OpenStreetMap

2013-10-18 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2013/10/18 Christoph Hormann > If you think this information is completely unreliable you can of course > ignore it all together. But keep in mind the river/stream distinction > is not an importance rating, therefore it is fully possible for a river > to run into a stream. > this discussion be

Re: [Tagging] [Imports] [NUUG kart] kartverket imports to OpenStreetMap

2013-10-18 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Friday 18 October 2013, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > If you think this information is completely unreliable you can of > > course ignore it all together. But keep in mind the river/stream > > distinction is not an importance rating, therefore it is fully > > possible for a river to run into

[Tagging] Feature proposal - Voting - Power transmission refinement

2013-10-18 Thread François Lacombe
Hi, The power transmission proposal is now ready for vote. It opens now and will normally be closed November 1. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Power_transmission_refinement Here is a summery : - It improves power lines tagging and prepares for power routing introduction. -

Re: [Tagging] tourism=guest_house or tourism=bed_and_breakfast ?

2013-10-18 Thread Janko Mihelić
I made a proposal for tourism=apartment[1] so we have a place to refine the meaning of this tag. I think the difference between apartment and guest_house is not very clear, but I guess apartments are a bit bigger, often have kitchens, and there are less of them in an apartment house then there are

Re: [Tagging] tourism=guest_house or tourism=bed_and_breakfast ?

2013-10-18 Thread Pieren
I've also modified the "Tag:tourism=guest_house" wiki and moved the "tourism=bed_and_breakfast" to a subtag "guest_house=bed_and_breakfast": http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house Pieren ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreet

Re: [Tagging] tourism=guest_house or tourism=bed_and_breakfast ?

2013-10-18 Thread Dudley Ibbett
As a humble surveyor and editor I would ask that we have tourism=apartment at the first level. An apartment is quite distinct from a hotel and a guest_house and we already separate out these along with motel, hostel and chalet at this level. The only debate for myself would be is at to whethe