Paul Johnson writes:
> Again, I'm still not hearing a suggestion that would keep this valuable
> information in OSM, or a compelling reason not to keep it.
It's not clear that it's valuable. If you want to propose a scheme for
desired corridors by only-slightly-authoritative organizations, fe
Hi,
The next steps with any tag proposal that reaches a hung jury is to read
through the comments and update the proposal to address the issues raised.
In this case I think the wiki page needs to be clearer about what this tag
is for (a few photo/aerial image examples would help), and how it diff
Hi Rob,
Am Samstag, 15. Juni 2013, 13:33:24 schrieb Rob Nickerson:
> The next steps with any tag proposal that reaches a hung jury is to read
> through the comments and update the proposal to address the issues raised.
>
> In this case I think the wiki page needs to be clearer about what this tag
On 15.06.2013 17:00, Eckhart Wörner wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> Am Samstag, 15. Juni 2013, 13:33:24 schrieb Rob Nickerson:
>> The next steps with any tag proposal that reaches a hung jury is to read
>> through the comments and update the proposal to address the issues raised.
>>
>> In this case I think t
Johan Jönsson writes:
>
> A proposed key for non-physical tagging of the rating of another feature.
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Awards_and_ratings
>
> award:=
>
> e.g.
> award:hotelstars=4stars
>
Last chance to cast your vote on this proposal of a new tagging system
