Hi,
I agree with you Martin.
And that's why I'm looking for a way to say "those power
lines/lanes/roads are on the same bridge/tunnel".
As you mentionned, the tunnel/bridge name can precise which bridge is
but it's not a relational (or even spatial) way of bringing objets
together.
Ok a tunnel i
Am 05.06.2013 um 10:37 schrieb François Lacombe
:
> As you mentionned, the tunnel/bridge name can precise which bridge is
> but it's not a relational (or even spatial) way of bringing objets
> together.
>
> Ok a tunnel isn't easy to map since we can't use GPS.
yes, but you can easily see wheth
Hi Murry,
being yet another German I'm afraid I still don't buy into the proposal. I
guess this has a lot to do with both cultural and language differences.
Also some background to start with. For many people in at least continental
Europe bread is a basic food and a key component of the daily di
2013/6/5 Martin Koppenhöfer :
> yes, but you can easily see whether it is one tube with both directions
going through, or if there is one tube per direction (more usual case due
to security reasons). Then you still have to define what is one "tunnel",
maybe also 2 (or more) distinct tubes could qua
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> +1, e.g. there is a cannon in Rome on the gianicolo hill that is fired
> once every day at noon (but I guess they don't put a ball in) in
> remembrance of the Italian unification.
>
I suspect most fixed cannon still in use have fixed
On 05/giu/2013, at 11:30, François Lacombe
wrote:
> We don't need to create dedicated geometry for an highway tunnel since the
> geometry of the road gives the path followed by this tunnel.
for Road tunnels this is mostly true, but if you look at caves or mines it is
different. I was mo
One reason it would be useful to be able to tag bridges (and, to a lesser
extent, tunnels) as single physical objects is that they may be used as
landmarks. For example, you may be traveling along a street that runs parallel
to a river, looking for a location just past a certain bridge. If the
Am 05.06.2013 00:11, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
> On 04/giu/2013, at 08:54, Peter Wendorff wrote:
>
>> A motorway with two separate highways in OSM may be one bridge
>> alltogether - but is mapped as two.
>
>
> actually we usually don't map bridges or tunnels, there is only the indirect
> ma
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:01 AM, Michael Krämer wrote:
> Hi Murry,
>
> being yet another German I'm afraid I still don't buy into the proposal. I
> guess this has a lot to do with both cultural and language differences.
>
> Also some background to start with. For many people in at least
> continen
Martin, John,
Can't we get the type=tunnel or type=bridge proposal voted and accepted ?
It need a little clean up and example of different kind but it seems to be
a good way to map tunnel and bridges.
Finally asking for comments and vote it is the best way to be sure of it.
Fly,
Tunnel and bri
Am 05.06.2013 um 22:35 schrieb François Lacombe
:
> Can't we get the type=tunnel or type=bridge proposal voted and accepted ?
This one, right?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Bridges_and_Tunnels
+1 from me, although we don't need voting to use the tags ;-)
an issue I s
fly writes:
> When was landuse=reservoir [1] deprecated ?
>
> There was only little discussion on tagging@ about water=* [2][3]. Now
> we have to different uses which do not fit together (eg,
> water=lake;intermittent ?).
>
> Anyway landuse=reservoir was never deprecated and has 20+ uses and
12 matches
Mail list logo
