Re: [Tagging] When was barrier=entrance abandoned ?

On 08/mag/2013, at 03:32, Tobias Knerr wrote: > A problem with the edit is that entrance=* is not limited to the cases > that barrier=entrance covers. For example, a barrier=gate could also be > an entrance=yes/main. maybe there was confusion with building=entrance which was deprecated in f

Re: [Tagging] Juice "restaurants"

On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Serge Wroclawski wrote: > I agree with specifically tagging them as juice bars (amenity=juice_bar). > > They also don't all qualify as cafes, since they don't all offer > seating, for example, if they're in a food court, or just a street > vendor with no seating. >

Re: [Tagging] Juice "restaurants"

2013/5/8 Eugene Alvin Villar > On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Serge Wroclawski wrote: > >> I agree with specifically tagging them as juice bars (amenity=juice_bar). >> >> They also don't all qualify as cafes, since they don't all offer >> seating, for example, if they're in a food court, or just

Re: [Tagging] Juice "restaurants"

And what should "cafes without seats" be tagged as then? amenity=fast_drinks amenity=cafe_bar Or something else? -Jaakko Sent from my BlackBerry® device from Digicel -- Mobile: +509-37-26 91 54, Skype/GoogleTalk: jhelleranta -Original Message- From: Martin Koppenhoefer Date: Wed, 8 May

Re: [Tagging] Juice "restaurants"

2013/5/8 Jaakko Helleranta.com > And what should "cafes without seats" be tagged as then? > amenity=fast_drinks > amenity=cafe_bar > Or something else? > > what is a cafe without seats? A bar? A drink booth / kiosk? You should tag it as what it is. The wiki says: "amenity

Re: [Tagging] When was barrier=entrance abandoned ?

On 08.05.2013 07:46, Ronnie Soak wrote: > > > I do use the two tags in a different way. If it is an entrance leading > to something (eg. building/amenity) I would use entrance=* but for a > small opening within a wall/fence I use barrier=entrance. This way I do > not have to cut t

Re: [Tagging] When was barrier=entrance abandoned ?

> Nothing wrong but different as said the second one is just a gap in a > linear barrier where you can pass while the first one is an entrance to > something. > > So you won't use entrance=* if you can't define an inside and outside? Well, at least that's an easy to follow rule. I'm not exactly su

[Tagging] Bridges redux

Greetings to the list, I've started revising my bridge tagging proposal based on the comments received in the last go-round in January. There are three specific questions I'd like some feedback on before I submit a full RFC again.

Re: [Tagging] Juice "restaurants"

http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/name=Jamba%20Juice Right now there is a minor majority given to amenity=fast_food over cafe for the worlds Jamba Juices. Is the argument out there that juice and smoothies should be considered food? Walk up, order at the counter food or drinks? Perhaps going

Re: [Tagging] When was barrier=entrance abandoned ?

I'm afraid to say that it isn't abandoned as I am also using it in rural mapping as described below. I would agree with the comment that people could tag, barrier=gate and entrance=yes and this would then no longer identify the current use of barrier=entrance which is a gap in the barrier

Re: [Tagging] When was barrier=entrance abandoned ?

The way I've understood these tags is that barrier=entrance conceptualizes/describes one thing (a gap in a barrier; a possibility to enter) whereas the entrance=* key marks an entrance (for routing purposes; how to get there). Surely we could change the barrier=entrance to barrier=gap or entra

Re: [Tagging] When was barrier=entrance abandoned ?

2013/5/8 Dudley Ibbett > I'm afraid to say that it isn't abandoned as I am also using it in rural > mapping as described below. > +1, I'm also using it. > > I would agree with the comment that people could tag, barrier=gate and > entrance=yes and this would then no longer identify the curre

Re: [Tagging] Bridges redux

2013/5/8 Christopher Hoess > > I've started revising my bridge tagging proposal > > based on the comments received in the last go-round in January. There > are three specific questions I'd like some feedback on before I submit > a

Re: [Tagging] When was barrier=entrance abandoned ?

On 08/05/2013 22:01, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2013/5/8 Dudley Ibbett > I think that the status of abandoned should be removed. +1, actually I just did it now. The Polish version still says 'Abandoned' (in English). I think the Russian version says 'U

Re: [Tagging] When was barrier=entrance abandoned ?

On 09/mag/2013, at 00:26, Steve Doerr wrote: > The Polish version still says 'Abandoned' (in English). I think the Russian > version says 'Unknown' (in Russian). Go ahead, I admit I only changed the English version... Cheers, Martin ___ Tagging

Re: [Tagging] Juice "restaurants"

"Brian Wolford // HOT" writes: 1> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/name=Jamba%20Juice > Right now there is a minor majority given to amenity=fast_food over cafe > for the worlds Jamba Juices. > > Is the argument out there that juice and smoothies should be considered > food? Walk up, order