What is the proper way to tag places that make and sell juice and fruit
smoothies? Examples in the U.S. include Jamba Juice and Orange Julius.
Alexander
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/taggin
Alexander Jones writes:
> What is the proper way to tag places that make and sell juice and fruit
> smoothies? Examples in the U.S. include Jamba Juice and Orange Julius.
I could call them amenity=cafe cuisine=juice, because they are not so
different from a coffeeshop, except for the liquid ty
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/cuisine=juice
>From humble beginnings...
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> Alexander Jones writes:
>
> > What is the proper way to tag places that make and sell juice and fruit
> > smoothies? Examples in the U.S. include Jamba Juice a
On 07/mag/2013, at 10:08, Alexander Jones wrote:
> What is the proper way to tag places that make and sell juice and fruit
> smoothies? Examples in the U.S. include Jamba Juice and Orange Julius.
I'd not choose amenity=cafe if they don't sell besides the juice also coffee.
Look how quite
I agree with specifically tagging them as juice bars (amenity=juice_bar).
They also don't all qualify as cafes, since they don't all offer
seating, for example, if they're in a food court, or just a street
vendor with no seating.
- Serge
___
Tagging ma
Hey
On the wiki [1] barrier=entrance is marked as abandoned. Did I miss
something or was this another edit without discussion ?
cu
fly
[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier:entrance
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http
On 08.05.2013 02:56, fly wrote:
> On the wiki [1] barrier=entrance is marked as abandoned. Did I miss
> something or was this another edit without discussion ?
I don't remember a discussion about this.
A problem with the edit is that entrance=* is not limited to the cases
that barrier=entrance co
On 08.05.2013 03:32, Tobias Knerr wrote:
> On 08.05.2013 02:56, fly wrote:
>> On the wiki [1] barrier=entrance is marked as abandoned. Did I miss
>> something or was this another edit without discussion ?
>
> I don't remember a discussion about this.
>
> A problem with the edit is that entrance=*
>
> I do use the two tags in a different way. If it is an entrance leading
> to something (eg. building/amenity) I would use entrance=* but for a
> small opening within a wall/fence I use barrier=entrance. This way I do
> not have to cut the linear barrier.
>
What's wrong with entrance=* in the se
