Re: [Tagging] New Proposal

2013-05-01 Thread Dave F.
On 29/04/2013 18:59, News wrote: I have created a proposal for a new tagging scheme at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/through_route From the wiki Example: "If you are heading north on the A56 and want to continue on the A56 then you need to turn off the main carriageway

Re: [Tagging] New Proposal

2013-05-01 Thread Philip Barnes
The slip roads are straight ahead, whilst the through route curves to the right. The tag is need to tell the router that straight ahead is not stay on the same road. Hope that explains it. Phil (trigpoint) -- Sent from my Nokia N9 On 01/05/2013 11:00 Dave F. wrote: On 29/04/2013 18:59, News

Re: [Tagging] New Proposal

2013-05-01 Thread Georg Feddern
Am 01.05.2013 12:53, schrieb Philip Barnes: The slip roads are straight ahead, whilst the through route curves to the right. The tag is need to tell the router that straight ahead is not stay on the same road. Hope that explains it. uhm, had you ever considered to tag both following ways

Re: [Tagging] New Proposal

2013-05-01 Thread Philip Barnes
On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 18:20 +0200, Georg Feddern wrote: > Am 01.05.2013 12:53, schrieb Philip Barnes: > > > The slip roads are straight ahead, whilst the through route curves > > to the right. The tag is need to tell the router that straight ahead > > is not stay on the same road. > > > > Hope th

Re: [Tagging] New Proposal

2013-05-01 Thread Kytömaa Lauri
>this example, http://osrm.at/36D >To stay on the A511 no instruction to turn is given, That just looks like a bug in the osrm. -- Alv ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC -

2013-05-01 Thread wiki_openstreetmap_org . 5 . kuru
We already have that question on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/tree_shrine: My answer was: "I would say for the same reason why historic=wayside_cross is not a combination of historic=wayside_shrine and landmark=cross (or man_made=cross) since they can look very simil

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - historic=marker

2013-05-01 Thread Dudley Ibbett
In the UK many of these would come under the heading of "blue plaques". If you follow wikipedia through on this topic it talks about "historical marker" in the first sentence so people wishing to map these features may well search for this on the OSM wiki. historic=marker would there for seem

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - historic=marker

2013-05-01 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
I would use tourism=information, information=board, board_type=historic (or sth else more specific) for the examples on the wikipage: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/historic_marker cheers, Martin 2013/5/1 Dudley Ibbett > In the UK many of these would come under the headin