Well, disused:*=* and abandoned:*=* are widely used, you could simply link
to their Wiki pages.
For construction, we should make a general proposal separated from power
refinements, as you suggest.
Bye
Viking81 - Alberto
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging
I wasn't quite sure whether to start a new thread for this given the
current discussions. But I think it is a distinct point.
I have recently mapped a solar farm (in Cornwall, UK).
I found the current tagging scheme didn't fit this case very well: I
just stumbled across this large photovoltaic sol
My experience from working with power system indicators (for about two years a
few years back) is that you definitely should include the "boilerplate"
capacity values. The name of this value can have many other names such as
Installed Capacity, etc. Wikipedia had some decent entries on this and
Hi,
I finally agree with you.
I've began to update the proposal to remove relations in all cases except
when power plant doesn't have any physical permimeter.
We must keep role=generator for all generators (no need to distinguish them
there) in such relation since other features may be added too.
Am 08/apr/2013 um 14:25 schrieb ael :
> Has this been discussed before? It seems that we need a
> generator:estimated_output:electricity or some such for wind and solar?
IMHO the nominal max. rating is sufficient, the effective output can then be
calculated/estimated based on this and locat
I like the idea of increasing the level of detail of the streets, and
I agree that this would best be done by separating the routing network
from the visual presentation. I think this can, however, be done in
the existing data model, which is very flexible.
Further, we wouldn't need to disrupt the
On 08/04/2013 09:07, Alberto wrote:
Well, disused:*=* and abandoned:*=* are widely used, you could simply link
to their Wiki pages.
For construction, we should make a general proposal separated from power
refinements, as you suggest.
We really need a consistent life cycle scheme that defines al
2013/4/8 Ole Nielsen
> On 08/04/2013 09:07, Alberto wrote:
>
>> Well, disused:*=* and abandoned:*=* are widely used, you could simply link
>> to their Wiki pages.
>> For construction, we should make a general proposal separated from power
>> refinements, as you suggest.
>>
>
> We really need a co
On 08/04/2013 15:02, François Lacombe wrote:
I finally agree with you.
I've began to update the proposal to remove relations in all cases
except when power plant doesn't have any physical permimeter.
Thanks!
We must keep role=generator for all generators (no need to distinguish
them there) i
2013/4/8 Ole Nielsen mailto:on-...@xs4all.nl>>
not so sure, that "historic" is the right term for stuff completely
gone, currently the key "historic" is used mainly for stuff that was
created a long time ago, but which hasn't necessarily vanished in the
meantime (most of the stuff categorized und
Le lun. 08 avril 2013 à 08:48 +0200, Peter Wendorff a écrit :
> Hi
>
> Am 07.04.2013 22:25, schrieb Guillaume Allegre:
> I know at least one that's not excluding any other landuse, but has
> apple trees planted sparsely on the grass that covers most of the area,
> the German word for it is "Streu
On 8 April 2013 17:51, Dave Sutter wrote:
> I like the idea of increasing the level of detail of the streets, and
> I agree that this would best be done by separating the routing network
> from the visual presentation. I think this can, however, be done in
> the existing data model, which is very
Am 08/apr/2013 um 00:03 schrieb François Lacombe
:
> I'll update proposal with following generator tag values: generator=output or
> generator=intermediate (generator=* key doesn't exist).
I'd suggest a more specific key name like generator:role etc. Output and
intermediate might seem a log
Hi,
I've noticed a new page on the wiki : Classification of power lines,
created and maintained by Aldemarin.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Classification_of_Powerlines
It's a really good work, it gives many useful information about power lines
around the world (voltages, frequencies) and th
2013/4/8 Ole Nielsen
> On 08/04/2013 15:02, François Lacombe wrote:
>
>> I finally agree with you.
>> I've began to update the proposal to remove relations in all cases
>> except when power plant doesn't have any physical permimeter.
>>
>
> Thanks!
You're welcome :)
I've been sure it will satis
Hi,
Thanks for this useful question.
As the wiki page of generator:output doesn't give that piece of
information, I've been reading the original proposal of this key.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/generator_rationalisation#Output_rating
As said before it's the nominal max
Hi gentlemen,
I completely agree with Ole to say we really need a consistent life cycle
scheme.
Nevertheless, using :*=* to describe life cycle of keys instead
of objects doesn't sound good to me.
If an object has 3 successive different use cases, we would tag the two
first as disused:*=* but we
On 04/08/2013 01:40 PM, Markus Lindholm wrote:
On 8 April 2013 17:51, Dave Sutter mailto:sut...@intransix.com>> wrote:
I like the idea of increasing the level of detail of the streets, and
I agree that this would best be done by separating the routing network
from the visual presenta
18 matches
Mail list logo
