Hi Martin,
I must agree with you about the lack of simplicity of this relation-based
model.
I've been looking for a better and simpler model before updating the
proposal (because I'm not a big fan of relations since it's an abstract
object and we don't see them on maps), without success.
Even if
Am 07/apr/2013 um 16:34 schrieb François Lacombe
:
> Even if the spatial DB allows us to compute closed ways to get what is
> inside, we don't have any distinguishing element associated to all that stuff.
> Mainly, dealing with intermediate and output generators requires to know what
> role i
Hi Martin,
It would do the trick in common situations.
Nevertheless what if the same generator is intermediate in a power plant A
and output in a power plant B?
It's not going to happen often but I'm sure it will...
Cheers,
2013/4/7 Martin Koppenhöfer
>
>
> Am 07/apr/2013 um 16:34 schrieb
Hi all,
I do mapping in San Francisco, CA and I'm frustrated about the
inconsistent levels of detail we typically use when mapping urban
environments.
For example, most highways are mapped in a network-oriented fashion with
one string of ways representing both directions of traffic, often
In my view the streets should be more detailed - after all having the
details dropped by computers is possible (even if not always easy). but
detail that is not there cannot be add in any simple way. This case might
depending on the precise conditions fulfil the requirements for separate
direction
I do some mapping in SF too. The Muni Metro lines weirded me out when I
first saw it, and I looked up the proper practice on the wiki as well as
looking for a few examples in Europe, and it seems that the best practice
is to just add railway tags and the proper relations to the street whenever
it r
You can always make a rendering with the streets drawn wider at zoom 18.
That would solve most of the problems.
Mapping all the street as a series of parallel lines or areas will just
make a large mess of data that is a pain to decipher. It only really adds
value at very high zoom, and it isn't a
Hello,
I would like to propose a new tag for discussion, here and on the wiki page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/water_network#Water_network_.28drinkable.29
landuse=water_wellfield, a zone dedicated to water pumping for drinkable water
networks, generally with the follow
On 04/07/2013 11:58 AM, LM_1 wrote:
In my view the streets should be more detailed - after all having the
details dropped by computers is possible (even if not always easy). but
detail that is not there cannot be add in any simple way. This case
might depending on the precise conditions fulfil th
On 7 April 2013 20:37, Martin Atkins wrote:
> How have others resolved this fundamental conflict? More detailed streets,
> or less-detailed everything else?
>
I'd say more detailed mapping. Looking at the picture I think it's obvious
that Duboce Avenue should be mapped as two separate highways,
Richard Mann wrote:
> You can always make a rendering with the streets drawn wider at zoom
> 18.
> That would solve most of the problems.
>
> Mapping all the street as a series of parallel lines or areas will
> just
> make a large mess of data that is a pain to decipher. It only really
> adds
>
On 04/07/2013 12:13 PM, Clay Smalley wrote:
I do some mapping in SF too. The Muni Metro lines weirded me out when I
first saw it, and I looked up the proper practice on the wiki as well as
looking for a few examples in Europe, and it seems that the best
practice is to just add railway tags and th
I would see the root problem in the fact that osm has bigger scope that
most other maps - from low detail overview maps to very detailed (almost
aerial photograph level) city plans.
Describing physical area occupied by different features seems to me like
the only perspective possibility - With the
> From: tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Tagging Digest, Vol 43, Issue 6
> To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
> Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 18:59:06 +
>
> Send Tagging mailing list submissions to
> tagging@openstreetmap.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
On 04/07/2013 01:36 PM, Markus Lindholm wrote:
On 7 April 2013 20:37, Martin Atkins mailto:m...@degeneration.co.uk>> wrote:
How have others resolved this fundamental conflict? More detailed
streets, or less-detailed everything else?
I'd say more detailed mapping. Looking at the picture
Hi!
2013/4/7 François Lacombe
> Hi Martin,
>
> It would do the trick in common situations.
> Nevertheless what if the same generator is intermediate in a power plant A
> and output in a power plant B?
>
> It's not going to happen often but I'm sure it will...
>
Actually how could that happen?
Hi!
2013/4/7 Martin Atkins
> For much of the journey of these trams there is only a strip of paint
> separating these lanes, not any physical barrier.
>
> It seems weird to treat this like a separated highway when there is
> actually no separation... drivers are free to switch lanes, make u-turn
Hi again :)
2013/4/7 Martin Vonwald
> Hi!
>
> Actually how could that happen?
>
I don't have example, I was only guessing.
Assuming 2 different power plants with output generators in each (and links
for power exchanges between both) would help us to solve that kind of issue.
=> All right, my
Hi,
I found some tags be part of Lifecycle group on the wiki.
Like disused: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused
Do we have a stable definition of such a group?
I don't find any page dealing with it.
I'm in charge of a proposal containing a legacy life cycle management
chapter but I'm
Am 07/apr/2013 um 22:55 schrieb Martin Atkins :
> The photo misleads because the boarding islands make it look like there is a
> separation between the railway and the roadway. In practice this is only true
> next to the boarding islands;
Then the highway should be split for the part that ru
As you are talking about rendering of the roads. I am actually looking at this
for the new cartoCSS mapnik style for osm.org.
Currently we have several omissions in the mapping for level 18. I think 'all'
roads just use the width for the level17 zoom. This is unrealitisic and
misleding. I am wor
Hi!
Am 08.04.2013 um 04:44 schrieb John Baker :
> As you are talking about rendering of the roads. I am actually looking at
> this for the new cartoCSS mapnik style for osm.org.
Have you had a look at the style "Lane and road attributes" for JOSM? I know
it's not a cartoCSS style but it demons
Hi!
Am 08.04.2013 um 00:03 schrieb François Lacombe
:
> Hi again :)
>
>
> 2013/4/7 Martin Vonwald
>> Hi!
>>
>> Actually how could that happen?
>
> I don't have example, I was only guessing.
>
> Assuming 2 different power plants with output generators in each (and links
> for power exchang
Hi
Am 07.04.2013 22:25, schrieb Guillaume Allegre:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to propose a new tag for discussion, here and on the
> wiki page:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/water_network#Water_network_.28drinkable.29
>
> landuse=water_wellfield, a zone dedicated to wate
24 matches
Mail list logo
