Re: [Tagging] Historic huts

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Andreas Labres wrote: > On 28.03.13 11:18, Erik Johansson wrote: >> This sounds more like an tourism attraction than a hut though > > If it is a tourism attraction tag it as tourism=attraction (that's what I > said). > > But don't tag it for this reason: "to incr

Re: [Tagging] wayside_shrine - Bildstock - Marterl

On 28.03.13 20:43, Clifford Snow wrote: > Why not use the existing historical=shrine? The correct tagging would be historic=wayside_shrine http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dwayside_shrine I agree it makes no difference if the shrine (we call it "Marterl") stands on the ground or i

Re: [Tagging] Wiki article about key "hov"

I don't have an opinion about the issue (trust you that we need it). But does the abbreviation "HOV" make sense? There are good reasons why we avoid abbreviations in tags. Wouldn't some relation to "carpool lane" make more sense (in that it is understood my more people)? They are always lanes, ar

Re: [Tagging] informal helipads for emergency use

On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 6:47 AM, Stephan Knauss wrote: > Could it be stored inside the emergency key? > so leave away the aeroway and store as emergency=helipad? Since it is "informal" and applies to "level grassy areas", what will be tagged is just an "arrangement with the landowner". Because i

[Tagging] Re : informal helipads for emergency use

emergency=helipad sounds good, as the owner would probably be a little upset about just any chopper landing in his backyard in other cases. - Reply message - De : "Pieren" Pour : "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" Objet : [Tagging] informal helipads for emergency use Date :

Re: [Tagging] Wiki article about key "hov"

Hi! I agree with you, that abbreviations are usually not a good idea. But there are two reasons not to change this: 1) http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/hov 2) If we don't "like" hov we should also not "like" hgv. And I don't even start thinking about such glorious inventions like access:n2 -

Re: [Tagging] wayside_shrine - Bildstock - Marterl

On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 1:42 AM, Andreas Labres wrote: > The correct tagging would be historic=wayside_shrine > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dwayside_shrine > Sorry - I typed in haste and shortened the tag in error. -- Clifford OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch _

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tree Shrine

I would like to see a tagging proposal that covers more general cases such as trees planted in memory of someone (for example see http://www.thenma.org.uk/ ). For this we would need tags describing when the tree was panted, who it was planted by (if planted by a well known person or charity), and w

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tree Shrine

This brings to mind another related mapping question: How to map a forest or nature cemetery (e. g. "Friedwald" in Germany) (1) (2) (3) where peoples' ashes a buried under selected trees, sometimes with labels, sometimes without. (1) https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturbestattung (2) https://en.wi

[Tagging] Why creating a superroute type in relation when type=route does the work ?

Hi, I have seen relations tagged as type=superroute. They are already a lot of relations tagged as route gathering other route relations. And I found no documentation about superroute explaining the use of this odd tag. Is it a reason for the use of this new tag when the tag route seems doin

Re: [Tagging] Historic huts

Am 29/mar/2013 um 09:37 schrieb Erik Johansson : > I'm pointing out that this is neither objectively an > attraction nor a shelter, >From what the op wrote it seems these are shelters. Cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetma

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tree Shrine

Am 29/mar/2013 um 17:54 schrieb Rob Nickerson : > For this we would need tags describing when the tree was panted, key start_date > who it was planted by (if planted by a well known person or charity), > and who it is planted in memory of. if planted in memory of sth or someone you could

Re: [Tagging] informal helipads for emergency use

[First, I understand what you mean, and what you're trying to do. My town certainly has places like this for medevac helicopters.] I think this information clearly does belong in OSM. It's a fact about the real world, and it's easy to verify. But, I don't think they are "helipads". It might b

Re: [Tagging] informal helipads for emergency use

Pieren writes: > On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 6:47 AM, Stephan Knauss > wrote: > >> Could it be stored inside the emergency key? >> so leave away the aeroway and store as emergency=helipad? > > Since it is "informal" and applies to "level grassy areas", what will > be tagged is just an "arrangement

Re: [Tagging] place=neighbourhood

On 2012-12-17 19:11, A.Pirard.Papou wrote : On 2012-12-17 08:57, Michael Krämer wrote : Hi, 2012/12/17 A.Pirard.Papou > Have I, or rather JOSM, done anything wrong? I don't think so, I think the problem is on OSMI's side. "place=neighbourhood" is a some