Finally I took site=piste for consistency with pistemaps and route=piste
proposal.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Tag:site%3Dpiste
Yves
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/
All of these exist in taginfo, and have at least 10 hits:
railway:historic=station_site (376)
railway:historic=station (188)
historic:railway=station (230)
historic=station (10)
historic=railway_station (37)
historic=station_site (65)
disused:railway=station (223)
disused=station (64)
(And of c
2013/2/6 Steve Bennett :
> All of these exist in taginfo, and have at least 10 hits:
>
> railway:historic=station_site (376)
> railway:historic=station (188)
> historic:railway=station (230)
>
> historic=station (10)
> historic=railway_station (37)
> historic=station_site (65)
>
> disused:railway=s
I don't know what those mean, but there are two separate concepts being
blurred:
A) There used to be a (logical) railway station at a site. This
really doesn't have anything to do with buildings. Subclasses
could be if the station is no longer in use but the railway is
active,
Greg Troxel writes:
can mean two legally different things:
> "out of service"
> "abandoned (tracks present)"
Sorry, I didn't explain these:
"out of service" means the railroad chooses not to run trains. But
they might change their mind.
"abandonment" is a big legal step, where the
Hi,
Are there any arguments against using amenity=shelter +
shelter_type=field_shelter for field shelters (see [1]) for horses?
From the wiki:
The amenity=shelter tag marks all sorts of small shelters to protect against
bad weather conditions.
Sounds good to me.
Regards,
Martin
[1] http://ww
