Hi all.
I have proposed the start of the roller_coaster key as way to
standardise on tagging of roller coaster features. Especially now we're
getting details enough to be able to include this extra information.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/key:roller_coaster
The initi
On 07/01/2013 22:16, Pieren wrote:
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Eckhart Wörner wrote:
Except that source-tag-on-object does not work either for real-world mapping.
Source tags are rarely updated when the source changes.
Eckhart
I think this discussion and previous ones about this topic
d
Good start :-)
One point that jumps to mind: I would imagine that you will find the
"layer=*" tag to be better than "level=*".
All the best,
Rob
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Greetings,
I'd like to draw your attention to the following proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Bridge_types
In short, it's a scheme for marking up bridges (using key:bridge and
key:bridge_type) that's largely based on existing values from Taginfo
and fairly comprehens
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Christopher Hoess wrote:
> In short, it's a scheme for marking up bridges (using key:bridge and
> key:bridge_type) that's largely based on existing values from Taginfo
> and fairly comprehensive. Outside of OSM, there's quite a bit of
> interest in bridges, by hobb
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Clifford Snow wrote:
>
>
> Very through list of bridge types. Far more than I'm familiar with. Question
> - are you proposing that we map in the pier (support) as a node on the
> bridge similar to towers for power lines?
At user discretion, yes. It's probably most
