2013/1/6 Werner Hoch
> > I am wondering what current best practice is.
> > Should name be applied to both component ways and relation,
> > or is application of name to relation sufficient.
>
> For waterways, adding one name to ways and all names to the relation is
> at least "useful". Longer wate
Am 07/gen/2013 um 01:40 schrieb dies38...@mypacks.net:
> From an editing point of view, leaving source to be reported on changeset
> works to significantly reduce the amount of tag-value content you have to
> deal with while adding content. That is a very good thing.
>
> In closing -- I'm
Simone Saviolo wrote:
> 2013/1/6 Werner Hoch
>
> > > I am wondering what current best practice is.
> > > Should name be applied to both component ways and relation,
> > > or is application of name to relation sufficient.
> >
> > For waterways, adding one name to ways and all names to the relati
Am Sonntag, den 06.01.2013, 16:43 -0600 schrieb Toby Murray:
> On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Werner Hoch wrote:
> > AFAIR there's currently no relation type that inherits it's tags to the
> > member ways, so that the name tags are rendered on the map.
>
> Relations with type=multipolygon render
As a relatively new mapper I am rather confused about this discussion about
source. To quote the wiki for the tag, source:
"The source tag is a meta-tag, used for categorising the source of
information added to the database. It is not usually used for
rendering, but it assists with the veri
Hi Dudley -
Welcome to OSM! I think you've done great work & done everything you're
supposed to do. Then again, I'm pretty much a newcomer, too.
One warning: the whole topic of the wiki / tagging / etc. is a little more
chaotic than you might expect as a newcomer.
For whatever reason, some peop
Dudley Ibbett wrote:
> If putting source on the changeset is to be the way forward
I don't think that's at all a given. Serge and some other people are
proponents of it. Other people think it simply doesn't work for real-world
mapping. There is no consensus, but the numbers show that the most comm
Hi Richard,
Am Montag, 7. Januar 2013, 11:21:58 schrieb Richard Fairhurst:
> > If putting source on the changeset is to be the way forward
>
> I don't think that's at all a given. Serge and some other people are
> proponents of it. Other people think it simply doesn't work for real-world
> mappin
Interesting point about the wiki. I do think you need to be brave to update.
Sent from my iPad
On 7 Jan 2013, at 19:17, "Jeff Meyer" wrote:
> Hi Dudley -
>
> Welcome to OSM! I think you've done great work & done everything you're
> supposed to do. Then again, I'm pretty much a newcome
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Eckhart Wörner wrote:
> Except that source-tag-on-object does not work either for real-world mapping.
> Source tags are rarely updated when the source changes.
>
> Eckhart
I think this discussion and previous ones about this topic
demonstrates one point : sourcing
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Dudley Ibbett wrote:
> As a relatively new mapper I am rather confused about this discussion about
> source. To quote the wiki for the tag, source:
The wiki is not an authoritative source, it's edited and re-edited by
people with an oninion. On this very topic, I
Eckhart Wörner wrote:
> Except that source-tag-on-object does not work
> either for real-world mapping. Source tags are
> rarely updated when the source changes.
FWIW, back when changesets didn't exist and we had created_by on objects, I
took the view that the created_by tag was the property of
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> But that's not really the point... the point is more that there's no
> consensus, no sign of a consensus, and therefore any talk of "putting
> source
> on the changeset is to be the way forward" is premature.
>
+1
I have never tagged the
13 matches
Mail list logo
