Re: [Tagging] Comments wanted: Placement

2012-12-21 Thread Martin Vonwald
2012/12/20 Pieren : > I guess it's purely for rendering. Why not (like 'label'). But it's > only useful if you render lanes which is something I've not seen so > far (for nano mapping ?). Think of a navigation system with lane assistance - it's just a renderer with a very high zoom level. ;-) >

Re: [Tagging] Comments wanted: Placement

2012-12-21 Thread Ronnie Soak
Hi Martin, I surely get the intention of enabeling renderers of any kind to draw more precice representations of lanes on a way. But I have two comments for you: 1. I think it PARTLY IS about position. Your tag does two things: allowing the renderers to position the lanes correctly in reference t

Re: [Tagging] Comments wanted: Placement

2012-12-21 Thread Martin Vonwald
HI Ronnie! 2012/12/21 Ronnie Soak : > I surely get the intention of enabeling renderers of any kind to draw > more precice representations of lanes on a way. > But I have two comments for you: > > 1. I think it PARTLY IS about position. Your tag does two things: > allowing the renderers to positio

Re: [Tagging] Comments wanted: Placement

2012-12-21 Thread Ronnie Soak
Hi Martin, > >> 2. I have problems with the tag because it is (to my knowledge) the >> first 'meta-tag' to be actively used by consumers. >> It doesn't describe a feature of the real world but how a feature is >> described by our tagging. >> I much rather would like to see this information embedde

Re: [Tagging] Comments wanted: Placement

2012-12-21 Thread Martin Vonwald
Hi again! 2012/12/21 Ronnie Soak : > We don't force anybody to use a certain style. But we still say: If > you don't use the style we use, your work will neither be rendered nor > used by other consumers. That's not fully correct (in this context): it will be rendered and it will be used - but un