Hi,
from discussions on talk-it and talk-de there raised some issues with
recycling and waste. Initial reason was the tagging of collection
points for old pharmacies.
Until recently amenity=waste_disposal was defined as a place "where
canal boaters, caravaners etc. can dispose of rubbish (trash/w
I would prefer to see non-recyclable, or landfill rather than trash.
Trash is American, not English and I, and I'm sure many others cannot hear or
read it without visions of the ending of the Waltons.
Goodnight Mary Ellen
Goodnight Jim Bob
John Boy take out the trash.
Phil
Sent from my Nokia N9
2012/11/7 Philip Barnes :
> I would prefer to see non-recyclable, or landfill rather than trash.
> Trash is American, not English and I, and I'm sure many others cannot hear
> or read it without visions of the ending of the Waltons.
maybe "waste" instead of "trash" (the trash suggestion is from t
All,
I'm part of a group of people who are working to get a richer set of
metadata attached to the railway network in Great Britain, specifically:
- Tagging railway stations with the three-letter CRS (computer
reservation system) codes, which is widely used by train companies and the
public to
Wouldn't the route code be better in a relation? I'm sure there will be
some bits of the network which are part of multiple routes.
Why include the word "code" in the tag name for CRS (and nr_route_code)
and not for TIPLOC and STANOX?
Colin
> All,
>
> I'm part of a group of people who are workin
On 07/11/12 13:03, Peter Hicks wrote:
All,
I'm part of a group of people who are working to get a richer set of
metadata attached to the railway network in Great Britain, specifically:
- Tagging railway stations with the three-letter CRS (computer
reservation system) codes, which is widely
Source? Most of these things are "owned" by Network Rail, and it's not
clear whether they are publically available without strings.
I'd love this to be available (speaking as someone who made maps of delay
in a former life...).
Richard
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Peter Hicks wrote:
> All,
I propose a scheme how to tag existing map features with the awards or ratings
it have achieved. This does not mean that you have to or even should tag
awards and ratings, but if you want to, use this scheme.
Comments on the scheme?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Awards_an
2012/11/7 Johan Jönsson :
> Comments on the scheme?
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Awards_and_ratings
+1, besides the blue flag award for which it was originally created it
solves some issues with previous tagging suggestions (namely "stars"
for hotels and restaurants can
