Re: [Tagging] Animal_shelter, multiple semicolon separated

2012-09-21 Thread Alberto
Ok, how many of you vote to separate tags "amenity=animal_shelter" and "amenity=animal_boarding"? I want opinions from other countries, not only from United Kingdom. We could also use the key "animal_boarding=" to specify that a facility offers boarding service (e.g. "amenity=veterinary" + "animal_

Re: [Tagging] Animal_shelter, multiple semicolon separated

2012-09-21 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2012/9/21 Alberto : > Ok, how many of you vote to separate tags "amenity=animal_shelter" and > "amenity=animal_boarding"? I want opinions from other countries, not only > from United Kingdom. What's the point of voting? I think you are astonished because you were looking for a tag to mark an Ital

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 36, Issue 38, animal_shelter

2012-09-21 Thread St Niklaas
> Message: 6 > Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 15:46:22 +0100 > From: Chris Hill > To: tagging@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Animal_shelter, multiple semicolon separated > Message-ID: <505b2c3e.6030...@raggedred.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Why? We d

Re: [Tagging] Conditional Restrictions vs. Extended Conditions

2012-09-21 Thread Eckhart Wörner
Hi everybody, Am Mittwoch, 19. September 2012, 20:01:35 schrieb Eckhart Wörner: > == The task == > > […] It reveals quite a lot about the voting process that nobody has managed to solve this seemingly simple exercise (though several people have tried and failed), yet there is a high number of

Re: [Tagging] Conditional Restrictions vs. Extended Conditions

2012-09-21 Thread Ronnie Soak
Hi Eckhart, I've done your exercise and I did see your point: It is easier to ADD an additional restriction to an existing one with the EC scheme than with the CR scheme, because you simply add a new key instead of modifying an existing one. Did you want me to upload the result somewhere? How fa

Re: [Tagging] Conditional Restrictions vs. Extended Conditions

2012-09-21 Thread Eckhart Wörner
Hi Ronnie, Am Freitag, 21. September 2012, 16:30:42 schrieb Ronnie Soak: > I've done your exercise and I did see your point: It is easier to ADD > an additional restriction to an existing one with the EC scheme than > with the CR scheme, because you simply add a new key instead of > modifying an e

Re: [Tagging] Conditional Restrictions vs. Extended Conditions

2012-09-21 Thread Ronnie Soak
Hi again, > > there are more traps in that example. :-) > Traps? I've found a stray CR tag in the EC file, which I silently corrected. And one part of the way was tagged 120@wet even though it was probably meant as without restriction, which I now also changed to be symmetrical to the other side.

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (multiple addresses)

2012-09-21 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
I created a proposal for an extension to the addr:* scheme, aiming to resolve the issues with objects that have multiple addresses. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_Features/Multiple_addresses I hadn't noticed that there had already been a similar proposal: http://wiki.openstreetmap.o

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 36, Issue 38, animal_shelter

2012-09-21 Thread Philip Barnes
On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 15:35 +0200, St Niklaas wrote: > > Message: 6 > > Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 15:46:22 +0100 > > From: Chris Hill > > To: tagging@openstreetmap.org > > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Animal_shelter, multiple semicolon separated > > Message-ID: <505b2c3e.6030...@raggedred.net> > > Content-

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (man_made=cross)

2012-09-21 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
This had been a draft for a long time, it is rendered by the hiking map (www.wanderreitkarte.de), and someone urged me to take it "to the vote state as soon as possible", so it doesn't seem completely wrong that I set it to RFC by now. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcross I

Re: [Tagging] Conditional Restrictions vs. Extended Conditions

2012-09-21 Thread Eckhart Wörner
Hi Ronnie, Am Freitag, 21. September 2012, 17:31:16 schrieb Ronnie Soak: > Traps? I've found a stray CR tag in the EC file, which I silently corrected. > And one part of the way was tagged 120@wet even though it was probably > meant as without restriction, which I now also changed to be > symmetri

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (man_made=cross)

2012-09-21 Thread Vincent Pottier
Le 21/09/2012 23:11, Friedrich Volkmann a écrit : This had been a draft for a long time, it is rendered by the hiking map (www.wanderreitkarte.de), and someone urged me to take it "to the vote state as soon as possible", so it doesn't seem completely wrong that I set it to RFC by now. http://

Re: [Tagging] Animal_shelter, multiple semicolon separated

2012-09-21 Thread John F. Eldredge
Alberto wrote: > Ok, how many of you vote to separate tags "amenity=animal_shelter" and > "amenity=animal_boarding"? I want opinions from other countries, not > only > from United Kingdom. > We could also use the key "animal_boarding=" to specify that > a > facility offers boarding service (e.g.

Re: [Tagging] Animal_shelter, multiple semicolon separated

2012-09-21 Thread David ``Smith''
On Sep 21, 2012 8:11 AM, "Alberto" wrote: > > Ok, how many of you vote to separate tags "amenity=animal_shelter" and > "amenity=animal_boarding"? I want opinions from other countries, not only > from United Kingdom. I'm from the US. To me, "animal shelter" sounds like a temporary home for animal

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (man_made=cross)

2012-09-21 Thread Martin Vonwald (Imagic)
Am 21.09.2012 um 23:43 schrieb Vincent Pottier : > But, is it possible to have something more generic across the religions like > man_made=(something saying it is a small religious monument) > (something saying it is a small religious > monument)=cross|virgin_statue|statue_of > saint|chörten|sac