[Tagging] The Tagging philosophy (was the OSM philosophy)

2012-08-27 Thread Serge Wroclawski
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Ilari Kajaste wrote: > On 26 August 2012 10:42, Markus Lindholm wrote: > For nothing, and no one. Which also means: for anything, everything and all. While I agree with this sentiment, and love OSM's flexibility, I feel there's one place where this bites us in t

[Tagging] indoor maps

2012-08-27 Thread Dave Sutter
I am interested in doing some work for indoor maps in OpenStreetMap. I would like to get some tagging discussion started among the broader OSM community. In addition to a good standard, it must be insured that the new indoor data does not negatively impact renderers and editors. I have started wor

Re: [Tagging] indoor maps

2012-08-27 Thread Andreas Balzer
Hi,first of all: Sry about the bad spelling in my email, my spell checking Software is currently ruining my writing skills and I cannot turn it off. Short about me: I'm a student at TU Munich, Germany and am very interested in indoor mapping as well. I am working with five other students on a r

Re: [Tagging] Potale

2012-08-27 Thread André Pirard
On 2012-08-26 11:41,  Martin Koppenhoefer wrote : 2012/8/26 Michael Krämer : How about historic=wayside_shrine? Unfortunately my French is rather limited so I basically could only look at the pictures in the Wikipedia. But this looked quite a bi

Re: [Tagging] indoor maps

2012-08-27 Thread Dave Sutter
I have spoken with both Marcus Goetz (IndoorOSM) and Andreas Hubel. I should familiarize myself more with OSM 4D. It sounds like at least the four of as should talk in more detail to merge into a single proposal. We will have to discuss over Skype so anyone else interested please let us know. Per

Re: [Tagging] Potale

2012-08-27 Thread Michael Krämer
Hello, 2012/8/28 André Pirard > ** > On 2012-08-26 11:41, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote : > > 2012/8/26 Michael Krämer : > > How about historic=wayside_shrine? Unfortunately my French is rather > limited > so I basically could only look at the pictures in the Wikipedia. But this > looked quite a b