Re: [Tagging] reference_point and landmark for addresses

2012-04-04 Thread LM_1
Would not the problem with describing the position on the object be that you could still not find the reference object and thus it would be completely useless? If you have a location description referenced from "big tree" you need to find the big tree. There are multiple ways to get to the location

Re: [Tagging] reference_point and landmark for addresses

2012-04-04 Thread Felix Delattre
Right. So I just moved to proposal to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/reference_point The comments from Erik Johansson I posted on the previous proposal wiki page in order to not forget them in the future. As Lukáš explained I agree and as a first step i give priority to have

[Tagging] Value separator

2012-04-04 Thread yvecai
Hi, What is the best way to 'separate' values? I think about piste:grooming='classic;skating' or 'classic+skating'. Actually, this can be argued that this is a particular grooming type of crosscountry ski pistes, not a simple addition of a 'classic' and 'skating' grooming. So, is there any r

Re: [Tagging] Value separator

2012-04-04 Thread LM_1
I would choose semicolon, because it is used already (even if not actually supported) LM_1 Dne 4. dubna 2012 23:16 yvecai napsal(a): > Hi, > > What is the best way to 'separate' values? > I think about piste:grooming='classic;skating' or 'classic+skating'. > > Actually, this can be argued that th

Re: [Tagging] Value separator

2012-04-04 Thread Toby Murray
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:31 PM, LM_1 wrote: > I would choose semicolon, because it is used already (even if not > actually supported) Yes, semicolon has existing support, at least in editors. Data consuming tools don't really support any form of multiple tag values though. Except possibly the MQ

Re: [Tagging] Value separator

2012-04-04 Thread Tobias Knerr
yvecai wrote: > What is the best way to 'separate' values? > I think about piste:grooming='classic;skating' or 'classic+skating'. Reasons to prefer semicolon: Has been done that way for years. Is also documented in the wiki. http://wiki.osm.org/Semi-colon_value_separator > Actually, this can be a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - TMC - New tagging scheme for TMC

2012-04-04 Thread Eckhart Wörner
Hi, (sorry for starting a new thread, I just subscribed to the list) > infoware GmbH, Bonn, Germany, and Geofabrik GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany, have > developed an improved tagging scheme for TMC data which we would like to > propopose to the OSM community. I believe this is much needed, so thank y