2012/3/11 Johan Jönsson :
> I made a try to do go through some examples to see how it worked. They are at:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Johan_J%C3%B6nsson/Workspace
>
> what I can see, it looks like it is only the open-air public nature bath
> locations that really lack tags, swimming_
There seem to be several dimensions to this. "Bathing" can mean
different things to different people, with different English
words/usage. I can give a few examples.
Firstly, the activity itself:
*to get clean (with soap etc)
*to exercise or as a sport (swimming pool with lanes)
*as
Am 12. März 2012 11:06 schrieb Colin Smale :
> combination. I would suggest tagging them separately, to allow full
> flexibility and minimise ambiguity.
+1
> For the activity, we already have leisure=swimming_pool, for sporting or
> recreational swimming in a manmade construction.
What you de
Colin Smale writes:
> There seem to be several dimensions to this. "Bathing" can mean
> different things to different people, with different English
> words/usage. I can give a few examples.
>
> Firstly, the activity itself:
> *to get clean (with soap etc)
> *to exercise or as a sport (
LM_1 writes:
> 2012/3/11 Johan Jönsson goteborg.cc>:
> > leisure=bandstand is a good tag.
> > The bandstand is a prominent feature that is easy to map, so ease of
mapping
> > with one tag is prefect.
>
> Is this not bad, having more (independent) information in one tag? Imagine
that
> person A
That seems to be almost philosophical question about a perfect tag. I
prefer more structured approach, like you proposed for bathing.
LM
2012/3/12 Johan Jönsson :
> LM_1 writes:
>> 2012/3/11 Johan Jönsson goteborg.cc>:
>> > leisure=bandstand is a good tag.
>> > The bandstand is a prominent featu
2012/3/11 Johan Jönsson
> leisure=bandstand is a good tag.
>
+1.
--
Bill
@n1vux bill.n1...@gmail.com
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
