Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - second_hand shops

2011-11-07 Thread Ferenc Veres
Hi, 2011.11.07. 0:24 keltezéssel, Laurence Penney írta: > About a year ago Sean Horgan, Craig Wallace and I thrashed out some > ideas for charity shops. It just seemed wrong not to tag an Oxfam > bookshop as shop=books! The discussion was fruitful although, > reprehensibly, we didn't put anything

[Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - natural=ridge

2011-11-07 Thread Dmitri Lebedev
Hello, this is the page with the proposal: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/ridge Just look at this picture: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e0/North_Ridge_of_Mount_Rohr.jpg/400px-North_Ridge_of_Mount_Rohr.jpg There are peaks that can be tagged properly

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC -sport=disc_golf

2011-11-07 Thread Johan Jönsson
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/disc_golf This is yet another value for the key sport= As all sport tags, this could be used on places suitable for exercising the sport, for clu houses or shops. As for all sports tags, this tag is supposed to go with physical tag. If the pla

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - natural=ridge

2011-11-07 Thread Johan Jönsson
Dmitri Lebedev writes: > Hello, > this is the page with the proposal: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/ridge > There are peaks that can be tagged properly (although it's technically > possible to deduct them with some accuracy from elevation maps), but > between them there

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - natural=ridge

2011-11-07 Thread Nathan Edgars II
Is a ridge something that can be auto-generated from good elevation data? If so, probably only named ridges need to be mapped. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - natural=ridge

2011-11-07 Thread Dmitri Lebedev
Is a ridge something that can be auto-generated from good elevationdata? If so, probably only named ridges need to be mapped. I think it's ok to map unnamed ridges, just to show that some borders go by them. Also, on a flat map without elevation lines, but with semi-transparent overlay imit

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - natural=ridge

2011-11-07 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On 11/7/2011 5:41 PM, Dmitri Lebedev wrote: Is a ridge something that can be auto-generated from good elevationdata? If so, probably only named ridges need to be mapped. I think it's ok to map unnamed ridges, just to show that some borders go by them. Also, on a flat map without elevation lines

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - natural=ridge

2011-11-07 Thread John F. Eldredge
Nathan Edgars II wrote: > On 11/7/2011 5:41 PM, Dmitri Lebedev wrote: > >> Is a ridge something that can be auto-generated from good > >> elevationdata? If so, probably only named ridges need to be mapped. > > > > I think it's ok to map unnamed ridges, just to show that some > borders > > by the

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - natural=ridge

2011-11-07 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On 11/7/2011 10:11 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote: If you don't have the longitude, latitude, and altitude of a sufficient number of points in the database, any calculated ridge-lines are likely to have little resemblance to reality. This isn't magic, you know. I know. The cycle map layer uses t

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - natural=ridge

2011-11-07 Thread John Sturdy
On 11/8/11, John F. Eldredge wrote: >> What I mean is that if the ridges can be auto-generated, they can be >> rendered without being in the database. > If you don't have the longitude, latitude, and altitude of a sufficient > number of points in the database, any calculated ridge-lines are likel