Someone added last night a unique contribution in the wiki about a new tag:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle_accident%3Dtrue
If we believe taginfo stats, this key has not been used until now. The
wiki page is also orphan.
Is it a good idea to keep such tag in the wiki ? Should we de
It has a bad discription, it's a tag for a temporary feature (at least how
I interpret it) and it didn't go via the voting process.
So I would just delete it and point the writer to the voting process.
Op 17 aug. 2011 11:39 schreef "Pieren" het volgende:
> Someone added last night a unique contr
On 17/08/2011 12:19, Sander Deryckere wrote:
It has a bad discription, it's a tag for a temporary feature (at
least how I interpret it) and it didn't go via the voting process.
So I would just delete it and point the writer to the voting process.
Since when is the voting process mandatory?
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Colin Smale wrote:
> The whole basis of OSM is "openness" - you can
> use whatever tags you like. Discussion and voting is really required only if
> you expect other consumers of the data to do something with your data
I don't want to enter in such discussion. We
It's probably worth trying to include the original author of the page in
any discussion.
There's no wiki user page or talk page, but my guess is that it's this guy:
http://bryankaraffa.com/contact/
Cheers,
Andy
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@opens
I've proposed an icon. What action might be useful to get it actually
implemented?
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/3906
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> I'm interested in propsing an icon for "shop=farm", for highlighting
> roadside farm stands (this is a fun tra
For charging stations it seems exceptionally important to define the
plug style
available. A charging station with the wrong plug is just as useful as
a gas station
offering only nuclear fuel pellets.
The trick is to standardize on names for each of the various charging
paddle styles,
and al
In cycle planning in the USA the "bikes only" direction on a road is
called a "contraflow" lane.
My goal in mapping includes that the routers work (both the car and bike
routers).
Thus I have sometimes mapped the contraflow as a separate short little
parallel bike path. It keeps the routers
On 8/17/2011 3:11 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
In cycle planning in the USA the "bikes only" direction on a road is
called a "contraflow" lane.
My goal in mapping includes that the routers work (both the car and bike
routers).
Thus I have sometimes mapped the contraflow as a separate short little
p
That would be the two major drawbacks with the current proposal:
A. No possibility to have several plug types at the same node.
B. No clear way of sharing a node with amenity=fuel.
A: The the same scheme as for "liquid" fuels could be used (i.e.
fuel:e85=yes/no, fuel:diesel=yes/no, et.cet). Someth
For amenity=toilets there are lot of suggested attributes:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dtoilets
But among them none would distinguish a pit toilet from a flush toilet.
More importantly perhaps would be does the toilet have water and
handwashing available.
Some toilets may be
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Mihkel Rämmel wrote:
> Wiki page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Crane about crane has
> controversial information on it. On one place it says that these tags can be
> used on nodes and ways on other place it says that on nodes and areas.
> Shouldn't it be the
Hi all,
A light rail stop, would that be a railway=tram_stop or a railway=station?
I'm mapping the recently opened UTA TRAX extensions [1] and tagged the stops
of the West Valley extension as railway=station, but now I see that existing
stops are railway=tram_stop.
I think a tram stop suggests som
On 18 August 2011 14:59, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> Hi all,
> A light rail stop, would that be a railway=tram_stop or a railway=station?
Light rail is nearly always, if not always, trams...
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists
14 matches
Mail list logo
