2011/7/29 Steve Bennett :
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 2:58 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>> I wonder if this definition which was formerly part of the description
>> for highway=unclassified is still valid:
>
> I love it when people are brave enough to question the semantics of
> very frequently
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer [mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com] wrote on 29. July 2011 14:55
> If others change the definitions in the wiki for those intensely used tags
... there's a high probability that this will render OSM data inappropriate for
serious use.
Willi
__
Steve Bennett writes:
> I love it when people are brave enough to question the semantics of
> very frequently used tags.
>
> FWIW, here's how I use unclassified vs residential:
>
> residential: a street with at least some houses, that isn't a tertiary
> or above, and probably has a speed limit o
On 7/29/2011 7:21 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
I think the underlying problem is that there's a big gap between
tertiary, which should be a road that really is used to go somewhere and
residential, which more or less means a road that you wouldn't care
about unless you destination is on or very near it
I think that this cannot be discussed here. This has to be done locally.
In Belgium, primary roads are roads with a reference in the form of an "N"
or "R" followed by one or two numbers. The reference of a secondary road
contains one letter and three numbers and a tertiary has no reference but
ha
Greg Troxel wrote:
> I think the underlying problem is that there's a big gap between
> tertiary, which should be a road that really is used to go somewhere
> and
> residential, which more or less means a road that you wouldn't care
> about unless you destination is on or very near it.
An additi
2011/7/29 John F. Eldredge
> Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> > I think the underlying problem is that there's a big gap between
> > tertiary, which should be a road that really is used to go somewhere
> > and
> > residential, which more or less means a road that you wouldn't care
> > about unless you des
Nathan Edgars II writes:
> On 7/29/2011 7:21 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
>> I think the underlying problem is that there's a big gap between
>> tertiary, which should be a road that really is used to go somewhere and
>> residential, which more or less means a road that you wouldn't care
>> about unle
On 7/29/2011 9:17 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
Nathan Edgars II writes:
On 7/29/2011 7:21 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
I think the underlying problem is that there's a big gap between
tertiary, which should be a road that really is used to go somewhere and
residential, which more or less means a road th
I've noticed that barrier=gate nodes with a name=* tag don't show on the
main OSM Mapnik layer. Is there another way I should be tagging this, or
should I submit a ticket to change the OSM Mapnik stylesheet? In some areas
gates are well known by their names, such as on military installations.
-Josh
I've never seen a named gate where I would want the name to be rendered. But
there's no reason to change the tagging in my view. Just make a ticket and
see if the mapnik team is willing to render those.
2011/7/29 Josh Doe
> I've noticed that barrier=gate nodes with a name=* tag don't show on the
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Sander Deryckere wrote:
> I've never seen a named gate where I would want the name to be rendered.
> But there's no reason to change the tagging in my view. Just make a ticket
> and see if the mapnik team is willing to render those.
>
I'm curious why you wouldn't
Well, I just don't know any gates with names, exept city gates like the
Menin gate in Ypres, but they can't be closed and I should not tag it as
barrier=gate but rather as a building. I never heard of gates that can be
closed and are still important enough to get a name.
___
Sander Deryckere wrote:
> Well, I just don't know any gates with names, exept city gates like
> the
> Menin gate in Ypres, but they can't be closed and I should not tag it
> as
> barrier=gate but rather as a building. I never heard of gates that can
> be
> closed and are still important enough to
ships that generally don't move
i volunteer at one, a museum ship, the USS Slater in Albany NY. there
are more
than a few others, how do folks feel about tagging them?
the location of the Slater:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=42.6422443985939&lon=-73.7497025728226&zoom=18
richard
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
> ships that generally don't move
>
> i volunteer at one, a museum ship, the USS Slater in Albany NY. there are
> more
> than a few others, how do folks feel about tagging them?
>
> the location of the Slater:
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.
16 matches
Mail list logo
