Re: [Tagging] highway=unclassified

2011-07-28 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/7/28 Simone Saviolo : > 2011/7/27 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer > Then I can't honestly grasp what this "interconnecting" network is. > Or rather, I think I understand what you mean, but you're not defining it - > you're describing it with a vague term. to make this clear: the term we are discussing

Re: [Tagging] highway=unclassified

2011-07-28 Thread Nathan Edgars II
If there was any practical difference between residential and unclassified, the TIGER import ignored that in the US by using residential for everything unimportant. So when I map I treat residential as unclassified with mainly residential abutters, and will sometimes change TIGER residentials t

Re: [Tagging] highway=unclassified

2011-07-28 Thread Dave F.
On 27/07/2011 22:37, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2011/7/27 Simone Saviolo: 2011/7/27 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer Maybe I'm being picky. What I mean is: we have a worldwide graph of roads, or a "network" if we want to call it that. A grid network, to me, sounds like an orthogonal grid, like the one you'd

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Kerb

2011-07-28 Thread Josh Doe
There's been some recent discussion on the talk page, so please review at least the four sections starting here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/kerb#Height Open issues as I see it include: 1) Replacing "lowered" with "ramp" or "dropped" 2) Replacing "raised" with "normal

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] Use of official names Re: shortened names

2011-07-28 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/7/28 Colin Smale : > It sounds like there are three types of street name: > 1) Official, as decided by the Powers That Be > 2) Signed, as displayed on the signs > 3) Colloquial, as people habitually use > > So which one do we put in "name=*", and what do we do with the others? 1) should gene

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Kerb

2011-07-28 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/7/28 Josh Doe : > There's been some recent discussion on the talk page, so please review at > least the four sections starting here: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/kerb#Height > > Open issues as I see it include: > 1) Replacing "lowered" with "ramp" or "dropped" >

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Kerb

2011-07-28 Thread Josh Doe
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:15 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > 1) lowered is not the same as "ramp" or "dropped". > See here: > http://www.kohl-ratingen.de/images/kohl-markierung/z.299.jpg > I'm not sure what you're trying to say. Does the photo represent your notion of a lowered, ramp(ed), or

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Kerb

2011-07-28 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/7/28 Josh Doe : > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:15 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer > wrote: >> >> 1) lowered is not the same as "ramp" or "dropped". >> See here: >> http://www.kohl-ratingen.de/images/kohl-markierung/z.299.jpg > > I'm not sure what you're trying to say. Does the photo represent your notio

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Kerb

2011-07-28 Thread Richard Mann
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:07 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: >>> http://www.kohl-ratingen.de/images/kohl-markierung/z.299.jpg That's a dropped kerb, which is probably semantically equivalent to "lowered". But "dropped" is the standard en-gb term. ___ Ta

Re: [Tagging] highway=unclassified

2011-07-28 Thread Steve Bennett
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 2:58 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: > I wonder if this definition which was formerly part of the description > for highway=unclassified is still valid: I love it when people are brave enough to question the semantics of very frequently used tags. FWIW, here's how I use un