Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Kerb

2011-06-23 Thread Robert Naylor
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 05:32:54 +0100, Josh Doe wrote: On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Seth Golub wrote: Lowered was used in the original proposal, I'd actually prefer the term sloped. I think that makes quite a bit more sense than lowered. Opinions? I preferred lowered as slopped doesn't de

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Kerb

2011-06-23 Thread Robert Naylor
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 05:46:45 +0100, Josh Doe wrote: On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Steve Bennett wrote: On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 6:14 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: So: kerb=flush kerb=lowered kerb=rolled kerb=yes kerb=raised (ie, higher than normal, for a bus/tram stop...) Now, since

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Kerb

2011-06-23 Thread Richard Mann
kerb=flush would mean that there is a kerbstone (with all the potential for localised puddling, misalignment, settling etc), whereas kerb=no would mean there's a continuous tarmac surface - the latter occurs either if someone is trying to make a very smooth transition between the road and a cycle t

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Kerb

2011-06-23 Thread Tobias Knerr
2011-06-23 Seth Golub: > It seems that kerb=flush is saying that there is no kerb. As stated elsewhere, kerb=flush says that there is a kerbstone at the same level as the surrounding surface. kerb=no says that there is no kerbstone at all. > "lowered" seems to mean "raised, but not very much". I

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Kerb

2011-06-23 Thread John F. Eldredge
Robert Naylor wrote: > The problem I have with using kerb=no for kerb=flush is that there is > > actually a kerb stone still - eg: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:P1210669.JPG. In the USA, rural roads, motorways, and some suburban roads have no curb at all; you simply have a p

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Kerb

2011-06-23 Thread Pieren
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:49 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote: > often with a graveled shoulder extending a little further. This situation > would logically be mapped as kerb=no. I have seen flush curbs as well, > presumably where a road has been repaved multiple times without milling away > the old

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Kerb

2011-06-23 Thread Josh Doe
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Pieren wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:49 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote: > >> often with a graveled shoulder extending a little further. This >> situation would logically be mapped as kerb=no. I have seen flush curbs as >> well, presumably where a road has bee