On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:56 PM, John Smith wrote:
> On 11 June 2011 06:16, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Dave F. wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Is there a specific tag for pet supplies (food, collars, chew toys etc)
>>
>> I'm used to pet stores being ambigious, and don' hav
On 12 June 2011 02:33, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
> The problem with these types of proposals, of N levels of depth of a
> tag, is that they quickly become complex, and thus get unused.
>
> You, Dr. Who, are proposing changing shop=pets to now:
>
> shop=pets
> animals:fish=yes
>
> and
>
> shop=pets
>
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:31 PM, John Smith wrote:
>> The logical conclusion is:
>>
>> shop=pets
>> animals:cats=yes
>> animals:reptiles=gecko;snakes
>> supplies:cat_food=dry;canned
>> supplies:fish=block;flakes;filters;nets
>> supplies:fish:treasure_chest=no
>> ...
>
> I don't see a problem wit
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 13:04:34 Serge Wroclawski wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:31 PM, John Smith
wrote:
> >> The logical conclusion is:
> >>
How about shop=pet and shop=pet_supplies?
I am not actually sure that it is necessary to tag things in such detail. I
think it is sufficient in OSM
