On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:00 PM, grin wrote:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/illegal
I see a few serious issues with this scheme:
1) "illegal" is not really a category of things. It's an attribute,
and its meaning varies - here it seems to primarily convey a sense of
"info
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 13:52, Steve Bennett wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:00 PM, grin wrote:
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/illegal
> 1) "illegal" is not really a category of things. It's an attribute,
Yes it is. If proposing an attribute should have a different fo
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 15:11:52 +0100
Peter Gervai wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 13:52, Steve Bennett
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:00 PM, grin wrote:
> >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/illegal
>
> > 1) "illegal" is not really a category of things. It's an attribu
2011/3/9 Steve Bennett :
> illegal=squatted_property -> landuse=residential, owner=squatters
squatters are rarely the owner.
> illegal=graveyard -> landuse=graveyard, informal=yes
+1
> illegal=barrier -> barrier=fence, informal=yes
no, this is IMHO not an informal barrier, but an illegal on
