Hello,
Your valuable input is welcome and would be much appreciated.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/illegal
Thanks,
[[user:grin]]
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On 08. 03. 11 12:00, grin wrote:
Hello,
Your valuable input is welcome and would be much appreciated.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/illegal
Thanks,
[[user:grin]]
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.
I would think that if this was a good idea and it went forward, you
would want to require an additional tag to cite the
law/regulation/ordinance that has been violated. (and a link to the
online dossier with all of the evidence and data?...)
I think that this tag is not a good idea.
David.
On T
If the boundary between legal and illegal was so clear, the world
wouldn't have so many lawyers!
I would prefer to see an objective value, such as operator="Insert your
local council here". If there is no operator given you can draw your own
conclusions.
Colin
On 08/03/2011 12:00, grin wrot
On 3/8/11 1:54 PM, Colin Smale wrote:
If the boundary between legal and illegal was so clear, the world
wouldn't have so many lawyers!
I would prefer to see an objective value, such as operator="Insert
your local council here". If there is no operator given you can draw
your own conclusions.
Hi.
There are some remarks I have to that proposal:
What is the purpose, why we should want these places at the map?
Either they are temporary as you describe - because there is an
organization or something like that working on it's removal,
or it's a hint for people to do illegal waste deposit (
