[Tagging] Long-distance scenic roads

2011-02-23 Thread Nathan Edgars II
In the US there are two long federally-maintained roads, the Blue Ridge Parkway and Natchez Trace Parkway, that were built for the sole purpose of sightseeing. Since they are surrounded by a narrow strip of parkland, access is only allowed at certain points, so they are technically expressways

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Long-distance scenic roads

2011-02-23 Thread Ian Dees
They should be part of a route relation. On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > In the US there are two long federally-maintained roads, the Blue Ridge > Parkway and Natchez Trace Parkway, that were built for the sole purpose of > sightseeing. Since they are surrounded by a na

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Long-distance scenic roads

2011-02-23 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On 2/23/2011 9:46 PM, Ian Dees wrote: They should be part of a route relation. Buh...? I'm asking what highway=* value they should have. On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Nathan Edgars II mailto:nerou...@gmail.com>> wrote: In the US there are two long federally-maintained roads, the Blue

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Long-distance scenic roads

2011-02-23 Thread Ian Dees
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > On 2/23/2011 9:46 PM, Ian Dees wrote: > >> They should be part of a route relation. >> > > Buh...? I'm asking what highway=* value they should have. Do they really, truly fit into one highway=* category along their entire route? I was su

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Long-distance scenic roads

2011-02-23 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On 2/23/2011 10:10 PM, Ian Dees wrote: On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Nathan Edgars II mailto:nerou...@gmail.com>> wrote: On 2/23/2011 9:46 PM, Ian Dees wrote: They should be part of a route relation. Buh...? I'm asking what highway=* value they should have. Do they really

Re: [Tagging] Long-distance scenic roads

2011-02-23 Thread Peter Budny
Nathan Edgars II writes: > In the US there are two long federally-maintained roads, the Blue > Ridge Parkway and Natchez Trace Parkway, that were built for the sole > purpose of sightseeing. Since they are surrounded by a narrow strip of > parkland, access is only allowed at certain points, so th

[Tagging] place=city name=Tri-Cities

2011-02-23 Thread Nathan Edgars II
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/876536239 There's no city named Tri-Cities; this is the name of the metropolitan area that comprises Pasco, Kennewick, and Richland. I assume there's no defensible reason to keep it tagged as such, but what should be done about it?

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] place=city name=Tri-Cities

2011-02-23 Thread Samat K Jain
On Wednesday, February 23, 2011 09:06:31 PM Nathan Edgars II wrote: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/876536239 > There's no city named Tri-Cities; this is the name of the metropolitan > area that comprises Pasco, Kennewick, and Richland. I assume there's no > defensible reason to keep i

Re: [Tagging] place=city name=Tri-Cities

2011-02-23 Thread Paul Johnson
On 02/23/2011 10:06 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/876536239 > There's no city named Tri-Cities; this is the name of the metropolitan > area that comprises Pasco, Kennewick, and Richland. I assume there's no > defensible reason to keep it tagged as such, but