> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:06:48 -0500
> From: nerou...@gmail.com
> To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Emergency Traffic Signals
>
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:33 AM, James Mast
> wrote:
> > I've created a proposal for Emergency Traffic Signals, whi
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> I've already been using highway=traffic_signals
> traffic_signals=emergency (as well as traffic_signals=blinker for a
> single-ball blinker and traffic_signals=blink_mode for a standard
> signal that's in permanent blink mode), so I agree
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:20 PM, James Mast wrote:
> Then what would you suggest for the tunnel ones NE2?
I'm not sure.
>
> And what do you think of "traffic_signals:emergency=yes" for the base tag
> instead? Lulu-Ann made this suggestion on the main
> "highway=traffic_signals" page
> (http://wi
Based on feedback, I've modified
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/sluice_gate
> -Original Message-
> From: tagging-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:tagging-
> boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Paul Norman
> Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2011 7:36 PM
> To: 'Tag disc
On 01/13/2011 10:06 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:33 AM, James Mast
> wrote:
>> I've created a proposal for Emergency Traffic Signals, which are typically
>> found in front of fire stations and highway tunnels at
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/E
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Tagging single-aspect signals seems excessive overkill, given the
> propensity of single aspect signals and their standard usage emphasizing
> other traffic control devices (particularly signals that are permanently
> flashing yellow).
Maybe
