Hi All.
Please vote for new tag shop=anime
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/anime
Best regards,
ergo
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
How are your C++ skills?
Fairly good but haven't used it for several years. Maybe it's still sufficient
for writing a few patches. Why do you ask?
Wyo
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openst
Lennard wrote:
On 20-12-2010 22:29, Wyo wrote:
Hmm, no remarks at all. Now what shall i do next to get this into
renderers?
In the case of mapnik: wait. The current version used on osm.org cannot
rotate symbols, and we haven't transitioned to the yet-to-be-released
mapnik2 either.
In the cas
According to the Milestone date in 15 hours.
http://trac.mapnik.org/milestone/Mapnik2
...but I don't think so. There is no reliable release date.
Peter
2010/12/21 Wyo :
> Lennard wrote:
>>
>> On 20-12-2010 22:29, Wyo wrote:
>>
>>> Hmm, no remarks at all. Now what shall i do next to get this into
Craig Wallace wrote:
I think using disused=yes is a very bad idea.
It will break all of the existing renderers/applications that don't know
Here is a sample of a disused canal which doesn't break at all. I don't think it
would break with highways. If you use highway=disused you loose the infor
On 21/12/2010 20:17, Wyo wrote:
Craig Wallace wrote:
I think using disused=yes is a very bad idea.
It will break all of the existing renderers/applications that don't know
Here is a sample of a disused canal which doesn't break at all. I don't think it
would break with highways. If you use hig
Craig Wallace wrote:
There is a rule in the Mapnik stylesheet specifically for
waterway=canal, disused=yes.
There is no such rules for highways or anything else.
I'm astonished! As an ordinary mapper I'd assume the "disused=yes" would apply
to anything. In the case of highway it would horrible
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Sam Vekemans
wrote:
> ... and the reason for having a '0' was to show where (geometrically)
> it will be.
> So if people do know what the housenumber range actually is (or want
> to extrapolate it from statsCan) they are welcome to.
Two comments on this:
Why would
On 12/20/2010 02:51 PM, Toby Murray wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Paul Johnson
> wrote:
>>
>> I'm wondering why we still are trying the whole "describe the route on
>> the way" method of handling the ref= tag on ways.
>
> Because it is currently the only way to get any kind of highw
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On 12/20/2010 02:41 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Paul Johnson
>> wrote:
>>> the way's ACTUAL reference number.
>>
>> Meaning?
>
> Well, in context of the thread that spawned this particular question,
> the
10 matches
Mail list logo
