2010/11/1 Nathan Edgars II :
> What's the correct tag for a small decorative pool like this?
> http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=28.540045,-81.378424&spn=0.000987,0.002575&t=k&z=20&layer=c&cbll=28.540331,-81.378715&panoid=i0K7FBmQ_sgIfvQ9U6mOJA&cbp=12,146.51,,0,2.8
> I used natural=water but that seem
Bring me a shrubbery!
While doing some small-scale mapping, I came across an area of landscaping
roughly outlined in http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Landscaping.png
Landscaping typically has small trees, shrubs, flowers, and other decorative
plants. Being artificial, the natural=scrub and
2010/11/1 Paul Norman :
> Bring me a shrubbery!
>
> While doing some small-scale mapping, I came across an area of landscaping
> roughly outlined in http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Landscaping.png
>
> Landscaping typically has small trees, shrubs, flowers, and other decorative
> plants. Bei
Peter Budny wrote:
> If you want this to be the standard way of tagging things, then we
> NEED to get the tools up to spec. I also noticed that Potlatch
> doesn't change the role from forward to backward when you
> reverse a way. (JOSM does the right thing, though.)
Patches welcome.
I'm not
On 1 November 2010 14:46, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>
> - super-relation support
>
To anyone wanting to look at a nasty super relation, I would suggest looking
at the French administrative boundary which is a relation of relations.
Emilie Laffray
___
T
Marcus Wolschon writes:
> I'm using routes in way-simplification to generate simplified maps for
> realtime rendering of larger areas when zooming out.
>
> It's quite a lot of work with LOTS of cases to try to sort
> route-relations that are randomly sorted with parts
> being other relations inst
Richard Fairhurst writes:
> Peter Budny wrote:
>> If you want this to be the standard way of tagging things, then we
>> NEED to get the tools up to spec. I also noticed that Potlatch
>> doesn't change the role from forward to backward when you
>> reverse a way. (JOSM does the right thing, th
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Peter Budny wrote:
> As far as I'm concerned, the difference in what's required to tag things
> is minimal between these concerns. Therefore, wouldn't it make the most
> sense to choose whichever is programmatically the easiest and most
> flexible to deal with?
I
Voting page :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/right_left
E.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
