Am 29.10.2010 03:17, schrieb Paul Johnson:
On 10/27/2010 11:47 AM, Peter Wendorff wrote:
Another point is: if forward/backward is used, a mapper can see with
common knowledge, that tagging a stop sign at the intersection node is
no good idea. Compass could in theory be tagged at the intersectin
On 29 October 2010 08:24, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> Is there a standard way to tag a levee? It seems that highway=track
> embankment=yes would work for the vast majority of cases, but there
> may be some that service vehicles can't drive on.
Most levees I've seen in Australia don't have a track r
2010/10/29 Nathan Edgars II :
> Should this be
> separately tagged with such a name,
yes
> or is it assumed that a canal next
> to a levee shares a name (like a sidewalk next to a road)?
don't assume anything
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing li
On 10/28/2010 05:24 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> Is there a standard way to tag a levee? It seems that highway=track
> embankment=yes would work for the vast majority of cases, but there
> may be some that service vehicles can't drive on.
Most levees don't have tracks or anything on top because t
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 5:55 AM, Peter Wendorff
wrote:
> compass don't work if the way is rotated for some other reason.
You mean if the roadway itself is reconstructed? Then, no, it wouldn't work.
> But: forward/backward is easy to support by editors (as left/right is
> supported yet by JOSM e
Andy Allan writes:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:45 AM, Peter Budny wrote:
>
>> That doesn't work; there are cases where it's ambiguous. If you look at
>> [1], US-278 runs along North Avenue (bottom) and Ponce de Leon Avenue
>> (top), connected by Monroe Drive (left) and Piedmont Avenue (right).
On 29 Oct 2010, at 9:05 , Peter Budny wrote:
>
> P.P.S. Why do I see so many route relations where a way has been added
> more than once, sometimes up to 5 times, with the same role? What is
> that supposed to mean?
typically an error. only use case where it makes sense is a bus route which
so
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 5:59 AM, John Smith wrote:
> On 29 October 2010 08:24, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
>> Is there a standard way to tag a levee? It seems that highway=track
>> embankment=yes would work for the vast majority of cases, but there
>> may be some that service vehicles can't drive on.
On 30 October 2010 02:56, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
>>> embankment=yes would work for the vast majority of cases, but there
>>> may be some that service vehicles can't drive on.
>>
>> Most levees I've seen in Australia don't have a track running along
>> the top, the one at Goondiwindi has a footway
