Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - maze

2010-09-20 Thread Simone Saviolo
2010/9/17 John F. Eldredge : > Well, amusement parks sometimes contain mazes, but I wouldn't classify mazes > as a type of amusement park.  They are also sometimes a feature of formal > gardens; some hedge mazes have been in existence for centuries. Mazes may be fun park attractions, historic co

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - maze

2010-09-20 Thread Dave F.
On 20/09/2010 08:27, Simone Saviolo wrote: Mazes may be fun park attractions, historic constructions, decorative elements, structures for relax and meditation, temporary puzzles... I don't see them all fit in a single category. Maybe leisure=maze or amenity=maze is generic enough. +1 _

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - maze

2010-09-20 Thread John Smith
On 20 September 2010 17:27, Simone Saviolo wrote: > Mazes may be fun park attractions, historic constructions, decorative > elements, structures for relax and meditation, temporary puzzles... I > don't see them all fit in a single category. Maybe leisure=maze or > amenity=maze is generic enough.

[Tagging] RFC: more barrier types

2010-09-20 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
Hi, I'm asking for comments to the "new" barrier types listed here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/New_barrier_types If you miss something, please report here so that we can extend the proposal. I somehow forgot about it, but want to close the process now in some weeks time

Re: [Tagging] RFC: more barrier types

2010-09-20 Thread Peter Wendorff
On 20.09.2010 20:27, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: Hi, I'm asking for comments to the "new" barrier types listed here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/New_barrier_types If you miss something, please report here so that we can extend the proposal. I somehow forgot about it, bu

Re: [Tagging] RFC: more barrier types

2010-09-20 Thread Tobias Knerr
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: > I'm asking for comments to the "new" barrier types listed here: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/New_barrier_types Nice collection of missing barrier types. I've even used some of them already, so it's a good thing to document these additions. I

Re: [Tagging] RFC: more barrier types

2010-09-20 Thread Peter Wendorff
On 20.09.2010 21:50, Tobias Knerr wrote: M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: I'm asking for comments to the "new" barrier types listed here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/New_barrier_types Nice collection of missing barrier types. I've even used some of them already, so it's a go

Re: [Tagging] recording damage

2010-09-20 Thread Sean Horgan
Hi everyone, It looks like the push to define Humanitarian OSM tags in the wiki stopped in February but from scouring the web, it looks like the HOT is very active (http://hot.openstreetmap.org/weblog). Where is the right place to review the current damage/disaster-related tags? -- Sean On Sat

Re: [Tagging] RFC: more barrier types

2010-09-20 Thread John Smith
What about water filled plastic barriers? http://www.made-in-china.com/showroom/resourcesint/product-detailzqMJlfFDaQGv/China-Water-Filled-Plastic-Barrier.html They may not be permanent, but some stay in place for long periods of time. ___ Tagging mail

Re: [Tagging] RFC: more barrier types

2010-09-20 Thread Dave F.
On 20/09/2010 19:27, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: Hi, I'm asking for comments to the "new" barrier types listed here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/New_barrier_types If you miss something, please report here so that we can extend the proposal. Spike/Teeth Barriers http:

Re: [Tagging] RFC: more barrier types

2010-09-20 Thread Craig Wallace
On 20/09/2010 19:27, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: Hi, I'm asking for comments to the "new" barrier types listed here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/New_barrier_types Shouldn't barrier=curb use the UK spelling, ie kerb? Also, I don't see the need for barrier=swing_gate. It

Re: [Tagging] RFC: more barrier types

2010-09-20 Thread Richard Welty
On 9/20/10 5:35 PM, John Smith wrote: What about water filled plastic barriers? http://www.made-in-china.com/showroom/resourcesint/product-detailzqMJlfFDaQGv/China-Water-Filled-Plastic-Barrier.html They may not be permanent, but some stay in place for long periods of time. these are a varian

Re: [Tagging] RFC: more barrier types

2010-09-20 Thread Elizabeth Dodd
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 07:35:11 +1000 John Smith wrote: > What about water filled plastic barriers? > > http://www.made-in-china.com/showroom/resourcesint/product-detailzqMJlfFDaQGv/China-Water-Filled-Plastic-Barrier.html > > They may not be permanent, but some stay in place for long periods of >

Re: [Tagging] RFC: more barrier types

2010-09-20 Thread John Smith
On 21 September 2010 08:03, Richard Welty wrote: > On 9/20/10 5:35 PM, John Smith wrote: >> >> What about water filled plastic barriers? >> >> >> http://www.made-in-china.com/showroom/resourcesint/product-detailzqMJlfFDaQGv/China-Water-Filled-Plastic-Barrier.html >> >> They may not be permanent,

Re: [Tagging] RFC: more barrier types

2010-09-20 Thread Richard Welty
On 9/20/10 6:28 PM, John Smith wrote: On 21 September 2010 08:03, Richard Welty wrote: On 9/20/10 5:35 PM, John Smith wrote: What about water filled plastic barriers? http://www.made-in-china.com/showroom/resourcesint/product-detailzqMJlfFDaQGv/China-Water-Filled-Plastic-Barrier.html The

Re: [Tagging] RFC: more barrier types

2010-09-20 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/9/20 Tobias Knerr : > M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: > * Couldn't we just use barrier=rope/chain on ways, too? Introducing > barrier=post_and_rope/post_and_chain for this seems unnecessary. yes, I agree, actually someone else put this value there > * Isn't a guardrail a linear feature? It shou

Re: [Tagging] RFC: more barrier types

2010-09-20 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/9/20 John Smith : > What about water filled plastic barriers? > > http://www.made-in-china.com/showroom/resourcesint/product-detailzqMJlfFDaQGv/China-Water-Filled-Plastic-Barrier.html > > They may not be permanent, but some stay in place for long periods of time. Yes, which tag would you sug

Re: [Tagging] RFC: more barrier types

2010-09-20 Thread John Smith
On 21 September 2010 09:57, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: > Yes, which tag would you suggest? They are similar to guard rails IMHO Guard rails usually run parallel with the road, these barriers can be used to block the road to force traffic to be diverted etc... as for name, barrier=water_filled_pl

Re: [Tagging] RFC: more barrier types

2010-09-20 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/9/20 Dave F. : >  On 20/09/2010 19:27, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: > Spike/Teeth Barriers > > http://www.entryparkingposts.com/ > These don't allow travel unless retracted. yes, this is nice, I have never seen them, which value do you suggest? > There's also the less destructive ones that

Re: [Tagging] RFC: more barrier types

2010-09-20 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/9/21 John Smith : > On 21 September 2010 09:57, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer > wrote: >> Yes, which tag would you suggest? They are similar to guard rails IMHO > > Guard rails usually run parallel with the road, these barriers can be > used to block the road to force traffic to be diverted etc... y

Re: [Tagging] RFC: more barrier types

2010-09-20 Thread John Smith
On 21 September 2010 10:02, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> http://www.entryparkingposts.com/ >> These don't allow travel unless retracted. > > > yes, this is nice, I have never seen them, which value do you suggest? barrier=spikes or spike_strip ___ Tag

Re: [Tagging] RFC: more barrier types

2010-09-20 Thread Stephen Hope
On 21 September 2010 10:08, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: > maybe you can spot a more technic term? I'm sure they have a proper name ;-) Wikipedia seems to think they're just a subset of a Jersey Barrier - mind you, even jersey barrier is a new term for me. I have no idea what the UK equivalent is.