I'm doing detailed surveying and tagging of intersection turn restrictions.
However, I'm not always able to safely get pics from all four directions of
a typical intersection, so I want to be able to know to go back and do
those again later.
Any suggestion on how to tag an intersection as compl
On 13 March 2010 14:05, Alan Mintz wrote:
> Any suggestion on how to tag an intersection as complete (that is, to state
> that all turn restrictions have been tagged)?
Why not just tag those that are incomplete?
incomplete=yes/no
___
Tagging mailing l
At 2010-03-12 20:07, John Smith wrote:
>On 13 March 2010 14:05, Alan Mintz wrote:
> > Any suggestion on how to tag an intersection as complete (that is, to state
> > that all turn restrictions have been tagged)?
>
>Why not just tag those that are incomplete?
>
>incomplete=yes/no
That would be mos
On 13 March 2010 14:21, Alan Mintz wrote:
> That would be most of the planet, as opposed to just a few thousand that I
> may actually survey/tag :)
You are assuming others are going to mark things complete, or that
turning restrictions are static.
My suggestion allows you to mark things you are
On 13 March 2010 14:25, John Smith wrote:
> On 13 March 2010 14:21, Alan Mintz wrote:
>> That would be most of the planet, as opposed to just a few thousand that I
>> may actually survey/tag :)
>
> You are assuming others are going to mark things complete, or that
> turning restrictions are stati
Cool,
As of right now, the wiki is the most current source for the tagging details.
The GoogleDocs chart is not far behind. :-)
Because this is a NRCan vanvec product (directly from the source) any
changes to the tagging structure needs to be directly with the
talk-ca@ AND NRCan directly, so then
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Alan Mintz
> wrote:
> At 2010-03-12 20:07, John Smith wrote:
> >On 13 March 2010 14:05, Alan Mintz
> >>
> wrote:
> > > Any suggestion on how to tag an intersection as complete (that is, to
> state
> > > that all turn restrictions have been tagged)?
> >
> >Why no
