Martin Fossdal Guttesen wrote:
>
>
>--
>From: "Randy"
>Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2009 6:47 AM
>To:
>Subject: Re: [Tagging] Post_Box and addr:* nodes
>
>>Matthias Julius wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>I wonder what purpose this is supposed to serve. If a post
Steve Bennett wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Roy Wallace wrote:
>
>>
>> Well, ask yourself: what verifiable information about this path can I
>> share with others? That's what you should tag. In this example,
>> "surface=pavers, width=0.75" sounds fine to me.
>>
>
> I actually can't t
Steve Bennett wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>> >cycleway=curb_delimited
>>
>> I'm against this. If it's seperated by a curb, that counts as a median,
>> and should be treated as a seperate way.
>>
>>
> IMHO, options are good. If it's separated by a median, t
Greg Troxel wrote:
> I don't follow this. I think that in the US a cycleway would be called
> either a "bike path" or "rail trail", depending on origin.
You'd likely be wrong. Willamette Greenway is a very long, very popular
bicycle arterial in Portland. The only thing it implies is
non-motori
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> Suitability for certain types of vehicles. Can I take a bicycle
> down this if I've got my kid on a third-wheel pusher? Can I take a
> bicycle down this with a 1m wide trailer?
>
...would I take my girlfriend down this, etc. Yeah. There a
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> Never mind simply tagging it loses spatial detail in the process, and
> complicates routing engines (since turns are often restricted or
> prohibited from the cycle track across the adjacent road and vice
> versa).
>
>
I would love to hear
Quesion is: is there anything different about them from other kinds of
multi-modal paths? Suggest we tag them highway=chaos like everything else.
Steve
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
