--
From: "Randy"
Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2009 6:47 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Post_Box and addr:* nodes
> Matthias Julius wrote:
>
>>
>>I wonder what purpose this is supposed to serve. If a post box is
>>attached to a building it might m
Mike Harris
> -Original Message-
> From: tagging-boun...@openstreetmap.org
> [mailto:tagging-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Greg Troxel
> Sent: 18 December 2009 13:48
> To: Paul Johnson
> Cc: t...@openstreetmap.org; tagging@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk]
> -Original Message-
> From: tagging-boun...@openstreetmap.org
> [mailto:tagging-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Roy Wallace
> Sent: 18 December 2009 21:37
> To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Post_Box and addr:* nodes
>
> On Sat, Dec 19, 20
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Ulf Lamping wrote:
> Am 14.12.2009 21:56, schrieb Steve Bennett:
> > It's great that people are looking for specific items like that and
> > pointing out discrepancies. Keep it up.
>
> Just one more:
>
> Some JOSM rules contain b= for binary values.
>
> b="yes" mea
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> >cycleway=curb_delimited
>
> I'm against this. If it's seperated by a curb, that counts as a median,
> and should be treated as a seperate way.
>
>
IMHO, options are good. If it's separated by a median, that means you're
justified in map
